Ukraine -> dismantles the fossil fuel infrastructure powering the russian war machine.

russia -> aims heavy missile artillery at civilian gas stations and commits state terror.

There are many differences between these two strategies, but the biggest one outside of the human atrocity is that committing acts of state terror against individual gas stations does not create a logistical collapse of fossil fuel infrastructure, it only creates a bottleneck. To put it another way, the “tactical success” of this doesn’t contribute anything to a broader strategy, it is just another act of state terror added to the heap, more Ukrainian civilians murdered more Ukrainian’s lives upended… but nothing strategically has been accomplished.

On the other hand Ukraine isn’t really creating bottlenecks in the russia logistics infrastructure at this point so much as knocking it over like dominoes. Each tactical success of a Ukrainian logistical strike is contributing to a broader strategy focused on an outcome other than murder. Blow up the factory that makes parts for the tanks and missiles, blow up the factory that supplies those factories… blow up the train infrastructure connecting the factories… While human lives are certainly lost in this process, there is a clear objective here that is unrelated to killing for killing’s sake.

On July 5, a Russian Tornado-S multiple rocket launcher strike completely destroyed a Marshal gas station in Izium, located in the Kharkiv region. The bombardment killed a 19-year-old employee and injured four other female workers.

Imagine using this on a civilian gas station? What disgusting psychopaths…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_(multiple_rocket_launcher)

If you are unable to use a weapon like this for anything other than murdering people at gas stations just trying to live their lives you have fucked up on so many levels I cannot even begin to express it…

The level that is relevant to us however is that it expresses a fantastic incompetence at war.