Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 天前Finally an explanationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square182fedilinkarrow-up1769arrow-down139cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1730arrow-down1imageFinally an explanationlemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 天前message-square182fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·11 天前Tolerance paradox in action!
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 天前I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-211 天前Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down4·11 天前The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
minus-squarewpb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 天前I don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
minus-squarejamesrandysghost@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 天前I think you need to re-read the comment…
Tolerance paradox in action!
I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
The tolerance paradox does not exist. See BeardedSquidwards comment.
I don’t see it. How does a society tolerating the intolerant not enable them to be intolerant, even if you believe in social contract theory?
I think you need to re-read the comment…