• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    that’s a pretty shit argument… you could say the same about almost any law… this is why we have the legal system. who determines what’s fact? judges and juries… and you have laws in place in order to sort things out before the courts need to get involved

    libel and deceptive advertising are exactly the same: who determines what is fact? courts… and people tend to do the right thing to avoid prosecution for the most part

    and then you have anti-SLAPP laws to protect against frivolous lawsuits

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        i have very little faith in your broken system… that doesn’t change the fact that what you have now is so much worse

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So much worse than what? The thing you’re picturing in your mind?

          You have nothing to compare it to, this is all just based on guessing. I have no doubt that people would have found a way to make things just as bad, if not worse, had the fairness doctrine never been repealed.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            it’s not really based on guessing… another comment here laid out exactly how the abolition of the fairness doctrine and rush limbaugh led to fox news and the conservative propaganda machine that you’ve got today

            what we’re comparing against is the observed effects of, and changes since the repeal of the fairness doctrine. i agree its not a given that these things wouldn’t have happened anyway, but there’s at least correlations to draw from. the comparison with no basis is literally “would have found a way regardless”: that has no basis in observation

            is it an ideal solution? na… but it’s better than letting propaganda from vested interests run amok

            never let perfect be the enemy of good enough, or better