What you did is make an assumption- that I don’t have kids. An assumption that you have no positive evidence either way on. And thus by your assumption, you claim I am unqualified. But again, this relies on two assumptions-- 1. that I don’t have kids, and 2. that someone who has kids is incapable of understanding the nuances of dealing with kids. I reject both assertions as unprovable.
What you did is make an assumption- that I don’t have kids. An assumption that you have no positive evidence either way on. And thus by your assumption, you claim I am unqualified. But again, this relies on two assumptions-- 1. that I don’t have kids, and 2. that someone who has kids is incapable of understanding the nuances of dealing with kids. I reject both assertions as unprovable.
Okay, I will continue to think it more likely I’m right than wrong, but thanks for the additional info.
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” --Aristotle