Thanks to todayās Supreme Court Decision:
In states with large Black populations that remain under Republican controlāhalf of the Black American population resides in the Southālawmakers will now be able to draw districts that dilute Black residentsā voting power. In his opinion for the right-wing majority, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that āin considering the constitutionality of a districting scheme, courts must treat partisan advantage like any other race-neutral aim: a constitutionally permissible criterion that States may rely on as desired.ā The Courtās decision is consonant with the philosophy, articulated by Kilpatrick in his earlier days, that the state is oppressive when it interferes with the right to discriminate, and respects liberty when it allows discrimination. And the decision fits just as well with Kilpatrickās later spin on that philosophy: Attempts to ban racial discrimination are themselves discriminatoryāagainst white people.



Translation, if districting is done purely to disenfranchise voters of the opposition party, thatās just fucking aces. By the extension of that logic, whatās to stop them from creating laws that prevent the opposition party from being on the ballot? Or make a law that says you can vote for anyone you want a long as theyāre Republican. Is that not ārace-neutralā āpartisan advantageā that would thus be āconstitutionally permissibleā?
Theyāre getting there