• CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      What would they gain from that? Insurance won’t cover lost income from a dysfunctional satellite. Also pretty sure if you could get insurance it’d be extremely expensive for a launch on an unproven rocket.

              • athatet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                13 days ago

                Because it’s profitable? I typed “space insurance” into google and it gave me webpages for companies who offer space insurance.

                Why would you think that it wouldn’t be a thing?

                • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I didn’t say it’s not a thing. I’m saying what would be the point of using it for fraud? You don’t make money from a failed launch.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                That’s literally what insurance is. They bet bad thing doesn’t happen. If it does, they pay you. If it doesn’t, they keep their money plus what you paid them.

          • Nighed@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            It’s a numbers game on rocket reliability. You pay slightly more for your launch, but if it goes bang, you get a big cheque from the insurance.

            For the known launchers, their reliability is pretty known, and newer (or recently exploded) launchers often give cheap/free launches while they are effectively testing things - helps make up for the pricy insurance.