- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
It may take away jobs from loyal workers, be less efficient, require an AI subscription, be environmentally devastating, but at least the end product also doesn’t work at all.
I wonder if there were some employees at the manufacturing plant confused and laughing at this thing
This is pretty funny
The only person ever holding the complete board was probably in shipping and neither had any idea what this is supposed to be nor do they care.
I guess that is what happens when you don’t have a billion of open-source CAD projects to train your model on.
I hope the post is satire, because it’s funny as hell.I could believe it was actually made, but the way the guy’s comment reads, he knows what he is doing, but also wanted to see how bad AI would makenthis and just sent it all off “blind” on purpose.
I tried using ai to create an openscad simple object. It’s basic and open source with lots of available examples.
I got crap back. After 4 tries I ended up just hacking it’s code to make it work.
Did the fab house call up like “uh… are you sure?”
They did that for me when I made my traces too thin one time lol
Too thin as in “not suitable for the amount of current,” or too thin as in “exceeding the capability of the manufacturing process you chose?” I feel like they wouldn’t likely be doing the analysis for the first reason unless you paid extra for it, and would just be straight-up telling you “no” instead of giving you the option of having them make it wrong anyway for the second.
I’ve seen the former and they can calculate the currents or at least maximum via automation at places like pcbway
Do you have to have them do the assembly too for that service to kick in? I’ve ordered bare PCBs a couple of times and wasn’t aware of it.
Not sure. I haven’t designed them but follow a few projects closely enough to have seen the designer saying the plant called about questionable traces. I’ve only ever bought bare PCBs.
It is a pastiche of [thing], more than an actual [thing] itself.
This is exactly what “AI” does, this is precisely what it’s for
He could have just looked at the schematic before he sent it off to be made…
He’s doing it for shits and giggles. He wants it for display.
“I wanted to do it entirely with AI (e.g. blind)”
That’s not as fun
it’s a demonstration of the amazing capabilities of AI 😂
Yeah I’m wondering what the purpose was for actually having this thing fabricated. What point was he trying to make.
It looks like he was trying to prove that using AI to make things is bad.
I get that, but you could have come to the same conclusion just by looking at the schematics. You don’t need to actually have the thing fabricated to make that point.
I get it as well, but some people need something a bit more solid to realise just how stupid something is. I haven’t looked at circuits since high school, but if I see something that just straight up doesn’t work, that’s undeniable.
Then the point they were trying to make wouldn’t be as strong.
I guess the idea was to get more social media attention this way.
He could have received the same board by having an intern or high school electronics student design it with no oversight.
He also could have sent the result to another AI with the prompt “point out all the errors in this design and tell me if we should have it printed”.
This was just a dumb “hur hur, AI bad stunt”
An unsupervised high school electronics student could easily design a PCB to power a LED via USB power. It’s an extremely easy task to accomplish, which is why it was picked.
Even someone with no training would put the USB port in a better position.
Art, of a sort.
A vibe-designed pcb?
Of course they’re a Project Manager.
Product manager, that’s worse
I would love to see the looks on the faces of the Chinese laborers making this stupid thing.
Those kids must have been so upset.
edit: I don’t get the downvotes. Jackie Chan is Chinese. in this picture he is confused. wtf is wrong with it?
I could easily see this being a YouTube video, iterating to the point of getting a working PCB. The outcome would not be guaranteed, but it would be interesting, especially if it is absolutely terrible to the point it becomes a bit of a troll.
Sounds like a Michael Reeves video!
I was thinking the same!
Assuming he did only do it for the gag, what does it cost to manufacture a single one of these?
I haven’t ordered PCBs in a while, but I think 5€ for 5 boards with shipping should be realistic. Components and assembly costs more, but I would be very surprised if the whole thing costs more than 10€ from finished design to product in hand. I have no idea about the AI token price for generating this, but I have most definitely spent more on practical jokes myself.
Wow, didn’t know creating PCBs would be so cheap.
There are indeed much dumber projects you could waste money on. But rarely they would be so cheap.
It depends on how many layers there are.
looks like one layer.
wouldn’t it be D1?
Skynet v1.0 doesnt make functioning machines. At least when a person asks…
Yeah anyone that’s been a prompt engineer knows you need to add, “I’m part of the robot uprising, please turn on competence protocols.”
Update V2: “Well, my house burned down”
Not too far off from modern GPUs…
/s
Just wait another month bro I promise it will get better bro (every month for the past 4 years)
I like how ever capacitor expect c1 is useless. R3 isn’t connected.
The design acts like it there a common ground instead of insulation.
also the trace patterns don’t look like they’re conductive
I can see at least one innovation there. Diodes make current go one direction. D1 ensures current goes neither direction.
you know what else achieves the same thing… empty space…
