• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s part of it, but it’s also just a fundamental misconception it seems everyone shares, that making life horrible will force surrender.

    And in fairness, there is a level of destruction that will do that - ask Japan about that.

    • cabb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Japan was already going to surrender. Their final decision came down more to the Soviets opening up a second front on top of the overall progress of the US in its island hopping campaign and defeat of the IJN than the use of Nuclear bombs.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is far from agreed upon. A popular view is that neither the atomic bomb alone, nor the Soviet invasion of Manchuria alone, would have caused Japan to surrender when it did.