Campfyre
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Artwork@lemmy.world to Space@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
7 days ago

This image of home just came down from the Artemis II crew.

lemmy.world

message-square
137
fedilink
975

This image of home just came down from the Artemis II crew.

lemmy.world

Artwork@lemmy.world to Space@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
7 days ago
message-square
137
fedilink

This image of home just came down from the Artemis II crew.

Taken after their translunar injection burn, there are aurorae at top right and lower left, and zodiacal light at lower right.

Credit: NASA/Reid Wiseman

// That’s home. That’s us.

Source

-–

Alternative references of better image quality mentioned in comments by @[email protected]:
- https://images.nasa.gov/details/art002e000192;
- https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e000192/art002e000192~orig.jpg [5568 x 3712]

  • DivingRacoon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sony A1 MKii can hit 102,400 for stills.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      AFAIK anything past 32,000 is digitally expanded (which could be done with RAW post-processing).

      EDIT:

      See: https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/RN_ADU.htm#Nikon D5_14,Sony ILCE-1M2_14

      The old Nikon D5, impressively, doesn’t seem to do it even at ISO 102400

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        My 2015 Sony a7s2 has “native” iso to 102400, and expanded to 409600, but it was a special full frame low light sensor and it’s only 12MP (most from back then were 20-30MP with the same sized sensor.

        From Wikipedia:

        For still images, the α7S II’s ISO is 100–102400 with expansion down to ISO 50 and up to ISO 409600 equivalent. For movies, the α7S II’s ISO is 100-102400 equivalent with expansion down to ISO 100 and up to ISO 409600 equivalent. For still images or movies on auto setting, the camera’s ISO is 100–12800 with selectable lower and upper limits.[2]

        Also apparently one was installed on the ISS

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Apparently they are using Sony going forward:

          https://sonyaddict.com/2026/04/01/breaking-nasa-selects-sony-as-official-imaging-partner-for-artemis-lunar-program-the-first-new-moon-camera-in-over-50-years/sony-in-space/

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        “Old” high-end DSLRs are aging well, digital photography has been in the diminishing returns for a while now. You’re almost surely getting better pictures out of a 10 year old flagship than a brand new mid-level camera, and the “thoroughly tested” part matters a lot in spaceflight

        • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Still surprises me that it’s a D5 of all things, but then my main camera is only a year newer than that one. Not sure I’d use a DSLR at this point though.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            For what it’s worth, they are switching to Sony: https://sonyaddict.com/2026/04/01/breaking-nasa-selects-sony-as-official-imaging-partner-for-artemis-lunar-program-the-first-new-moon-camera-in-over-50-years/sony-in-space/

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Fairly well. The newest sensors do have better dynamic range, with some exceptions (like the fully stacked ones).

          TBH they should probably take a medium-format Fuji with a brighter lens to space. Or an A7S like someone had above.

Space@mander.xyz

space@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
🚀 Engineering
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
🌌 Art and Photography
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Other Cool Links

  • Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive
  • Live Space Dashboard

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 323 users / day
  • 1.55K users / week
  • 1.89K users / month
  • 3.63K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.37K subscribers
  • 625 Posts
  • 2.23K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ZafiraHUN@mander.xyz
  • Otter@lemmy.ca
  • Bitswap@lemmy.world
  • [alt] otter@mander.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org