cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44856828

As the war in Iran pushes U.S. gas prices toward $4 a gallon nationally, some lawmakers are pushing to suspend the federal gasoline tax in the latest attempt to try to control surging energy costs.

Lawmakers say the action would provide much-needed relief for families and businesses that rely on their cars and trucks to get to work and school and run everyday errands.

Asked about the gas tax at a Cabinet meeting Thursday, Donald Trump said he has “thought about” suspending it but suggested states should consider suspending their fuel taxes.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 天前

    The fact that states are thinking of pausing the tax just pisses my EV driving ass off. Here they made registration more expensive for EVs because “we don’t pay gas tax” so if they suspend it what are the chances we EV drivers get a refund? I bet its less than zero.

    Meanwhite the drivers of the polluters and gas guzzlers get a discound to continue to pollute. They should be making EVs more desirable by having no tax or extra fees, make others jealous and have FOMO.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      3 天前

      The EV fees are a very stupid solution to a real policy issue.

      They should change it to a fee by vehicle weight, based on road wear caused. This means the vast majority of road maintenance will be paid for by the groups that actually cause it: trucking companies.

      We can keep gas taxes as a fee for poisoning everyone.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 天前

        Trucking companies will be very happy to pass that cost along to you, esteemed final consumer.

        Road infrastructure is already heavily subsidized by the taxpayers, which in the US is basically the same as saying drivers, so I don’t see how that changes anything.

        • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 天前

          The point is that it would force trucking companies to make choices that consider effects on the road infrastructure.

          Do I continue shipping pretty much everything in trucks as big as possible? Or do I consider smaller trucks for shorter distances? Maybe I should hire developers to determine the most cost-efficient system of paths by small trucks and large trucks? What if I used trains or ships for some long distance travels? Would that make sense? Etc.