Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netM to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.netEnglish · 4 days agoSupply and demandslrpnk.netimagemessage-square227fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imageSupply and demandslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netM to solarpunk memes@slrpnk.netEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square227fedilink
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 days agoI see, but I’m saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don’t see how there could be an objection to that.
minus-squareRamenJunkie@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-23 days agoBecause we aren’t deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still. When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days ago we aren’t deploying it enough When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment. I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says.
I see, but I’m saying that nobody is worrying about the economy here except as a means to make sure more solar power is deployed, in service of not making parts of the earth uninhabitable, and I don’t see how there could be an objection to that.
Because we aren’t deploying it enough, because we are entertaining a return to coal or and fighting wars over oil still.
When we should be converting to solar and wind, reguardless of cost or return on investment.
I am pretty sure the article is in full agreement with you on these things and I think you are misunderstanding what it says.