Just six days after Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York, a Bureau of Prisons “After-Actions team” swept the jail and shredded “huge amounts of paperwork,” recruiting the help of at least two inmates to dispose of the files in a dumpster, a newly une...
I, too, am curious. So we should investigate, right?
If we can’t establish a reason why, no not really. This isn’t suspicious on it’s own - there’s shitloads of evidence they didn’t shred that’s pretty damning, and prisons shred all kinds of documents on a normal day. It’s way more reasonable, if this report is true, for the explanation to be something like “they weren’t shredding documents because of the investigation, and once they’d gone through and picked everything important out, the remainder was shredded”. That fits with my experience being inspected like this, explains why they still have piles of incriminating unshredded evidence, why there would be a sudden surplus of shredded records and why they’d be bothering to shred sensitive documents at the prision (they were normal documents that had just gone unshredded while they were being investigated.)
There’s so much more that can and should be investigated here, this just seems like clickbait.
Wow
Wow…?
No one should read past you saying this shouldn’t be investigated.
So you’ve got a reason why a vague report of documents being shredded should be explicitly investigated, instead of investigating the mountains of documents that this group saved and which have already been highly incriminating?
It just seems like a real waste of time to investigate the destruction of documents by a group of known individuals whose job is to selectively destroy documents. What is there to gain?
Understanding is to be gained. You can dance around that all you want but it’s clearly suspicious even if there was no wrongdoing
Understanding of what, though? We already know they destroyed documents, and there’s mundane procedural explanations for the hypothetical discrepancy in amounts, and the group under suspicion has demonstrated they kept plenty of incriminating (or at least extremely suspicous and relevant) documents unshredded. What’s the question an investigation here would answer?
Are you really trying to suggest that investigation should only happen if you already know what you’ll find? This is so intelligence insulting I don’t know if you’re calling me stupid, you stupid, or both. 👋