• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      So you’ve got a reason why a vague report of documents being shredded should be explicitly investigated, instead of investigating the mountains of documents that this group saved and which have already been highly incriminating?

      It just seems like a real waste of time to investigate the destruction of documents by a group of known individuals whose job is to selectively destroy documents. What is there to gain?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Understanding is to be gained. You can dance around that all you want but it’s clearly suspicious even if there was no wrongdoing

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Understanding of what, though? We already know they destroyed documents, and there’s mundane procedural explanations for the hypothetical discrepancy in amounts, and the group under suspicion has demonstrated they kept plenty of incriminating (or at least extremely suspicous and relevant) documents unshredded. What’s the question an investigation here would answer?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Are you really trying to suggest that investigation should only happen if you already know what you’ll find? This is so intelligence insulting I don’t know if you’re calling me stupid, you stupid, or both. 👋

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Nnnnno, I’m suggesting that unless you have a question that you want answers to there’s no point in investigating something. Even a fact-finding mission has a goal. Whats the goal with investigating this?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                “why were these fucking files destroyed?”

                How is that not abundantly obvious? Answer: it is.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Yeah, this is exactly my initial point. You already have that answer - the BoP’s team’s job was to, among other things, preserve relevant material (ergo the rest aren’t preserved). Shredding documents is so routine that they have a shredded document dumpster, so presumably documents are regularly shredded when they are deemed not worth preserving.

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    I admittedly didn’t read the article, but if anything people are saying itt is true then some investigation would be required. Honestly I am way too fatigued to read every article about these fascists. If I hadn’t seen 100 pieces of undeniable evidence about their crimes, I’d probably be less likely to make quick judgements like these 🤷‍♂️