• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    “I know someone who only did a murder once and they locked them right up. Suggest you reset your opinions a bit.”

    Replace murder with any crime.

    If you don’t want to face the consequences, don’t do the action that begets the consequences.

    TLDR: don’t fuck around if you don’t wanna find out.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.

        • plz1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I was arguing with the point of “repeatedly” being a determining factor for having to have this device. It’s not reality, once is enough.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.