There are plenty of scientific studies on how bad they are, but since society and economic pressure demand parents to kill themselves for their jobs, it’s no wonder they have little to no energy to actually parent and resort to the easiest solution.
I’ve seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones
Continuous glucose monitors update to smartphone apps. Zero tolerance phone policies are disability discrimination lawsuits waiting to happen and the schools the 0.01% have lawyers good enough to figure that out.
YouTube is awful for children.
phones in general are awful for children
I’ve seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones.
They can afford nannies to make sure that the next generation of leaders knows how to think
There are plenty of scientific studies on how bad they are, but since society and economic pressure demand parents to kill themselves for their jobs, it’s no wonder they have little to no energy to actually parent and resort to the easiest solution.
Continuous glucose monitors update to smartphone apps. Zero tolerance phone policies are disability discrimination lawsuits waiting to happen and the schools the 0.01% have lawyers good enough to figure that out.
Or, someone could develop a ‘dumb’ machine that only monitors the medical information and nothing else.
what could be does not change what is
So, you’re trying to say that there’s a literal reason it can’t be done?
That it would be illegal, or physically impossible, to do it?
Because that’s just silly.
While I agree that YouTube should be monitored, you’re making the same comment as someone in the 80s talking about cartoons on TV.
Meaningless argument.
Some one can say “I don’t like Nazis” and then say “I don’t like tomato soup” a week later. It doesn’t mean you can compare the two.