• AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Trials included three types of stainless steels and a stainless steel saucepan; cooking times of 2 to 20 hours

      Thats a bit longer than I usually brew my coffee! I use a glass French press though.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Clicked the link, it said “you’ve got 10% off!” and asked for my email, sure that’s fine, then asked for my phone number with this:

    By providing your number and clicking the button, you agree to receive recurring auto-dialed marketing SMS (including cart reminders; AI content; artificial or prerecorded voices) and our Terms of Service (including arbitration).

    Nope, fuck you.

  • Philharmonic3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The company that took over Aeropress is out of touch to say the least. It’s a shame they fucked up the product. I really like my old plastic one. Fuck the corpo shit stains who are only motivated by profit.

  • catalyst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Big aeropress, glass aeropress, now metal aeropress! What’s next? Gotta diversify that product line for maximum profits!

    (Disclaimer: long time plastic aeropress user here. 😊)

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As much as I would like to set it on the floor and step on it for “ghettospresso,” that price is ridiculous.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Aeropress was never anything like expresso. it just makes a fast cup easily, and the best part is the way the puck pops out into the trash and there is minimal clean up and no pod waste.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where’s my V60 gang? We take the aeropress camping, but I like the simplicity of the V60 at home

    • jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve been thinking of switching from my usual French press method to a V60, seems simpler for one cup.

      Have you looked into reusable filters at all or do you use the good ole paper cone?

  • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I exclusively use the plastic aeropress (3 years or so) and although upgrading to something stainless seems like a nice upgrade I’d want to revisit best brewing methods and make that decision again before spending $150+. I don’t drink coffee every week let alone every month, typically doing week long streaks before taking a break, so this is cool to see but nothing that makes me rush out and upgrade.

    There seems to be some haters in the comments for the aeropress, I guess I’d like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you have a source of brew-temperature water handy, such as a water boiler, there’s the quick cuccumella method, which is pretty much drip coffee: Fill the coffee filter of the cuccumella with grounds, fill the water container with hot water, invert the cuccumella, and it drips through in a couple of minutes.

      It makes a nice tasting brew: More flavor than an aeropress, but not quite as strong as a moka pot.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      French press? Or a freestanding thingy that you put a coffee filter in with a cup underneath for a one cup drip coffee.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have had an original aeropress for over a decade, and I love it. The fact it’s plastic is my only complaint. I would sooner switch to French press or a pour-over cone than spend $150. Not a chance.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I guess I’d like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

      Pour over a paper filter. Cheap and fast.

  • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Pre-order ships in May”

    An eye watering $169, but hey it’s finally here.

    Slightly cheaper than the $199 stupidly breakable glass Premium.

    Slightly larger 12oz capacity vs 10oz Aeropress original, but smaller than the 20oz XL

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thats silly money.

      The charm of the AP is that it’s cheap and you can just lob it in your camping bag.

      • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Speaking of packing for camping, the website doesn’t say how much this new stainless steel version weighs, although I can’t imagine it’s too much heavier than the original plastic.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah I gave up on that idea - silicone pour over! Lightweight and crushable, no microplastics, works with standard paper filters and any method you want to generate hot water

          I’m fine keeping my press at home

        • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I think it will be substantially heavier!

          No thermal insulation also a big minus in my eyes. Missed the vacuum insulation part…

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            They need to vacuum insulate because heat conductive metal would be a stupid choice of material, as opposed to glass or plastic.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve never used one, is the breakable nature of the glass version a result of heat cycles or just because it’ll crack if you knock it by accident?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        it’s breakable compared to the $20 plastic original, which is basically nuke proof.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          But it somehow makes microplastics no one can see but everyone believes in. Christianity is envious of microplastics.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              what the fuck? the original aeropress is famously not BPA-free.

              oh right the other junk science scare from the early 2000s, based on ONE mouse study where they injected insane amounts of BPA in muscle tissue, then follow ups with more junk science.

              Let’s learn something today: Bisphenol A was actually created by a german pharmacuetical lab trying to make a synthetic hormone. In 1891, and it was revisited many times until the 1930s and considered a failure. It never showed estrogenic properties. Eventually, it ended up as an additive to plastics. The amount shown to be estrogenic in a mouse muscle, after injection, would be impossible for a human to consume in 10 lifetimes. This plagues most of the estrogenic research published.

              But selling fear sells media. So no, BPA will not give you tits.

              Now Aeropresses contain “microplastics”, despite no evidence they actually do.

              Another example of people believing bad science was the banning of DDT. One ecologists faked data about bird populations and linked it the use of DDT, so everyone banned it. Millions died of malaria as a result.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just the glass

        When I was more likely to have hangovers, my French presses had the habit of choosing that time to leap off the counter and shatter. The plastic Aeropress could survive a drop in just about any kitchen scenario and well beyond.

      • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        One of the big selling features of the original AP was its portability, i.e. you could throw it in your luggage, and durability.

        The glass Premium cancelled those features and was panned for it.

        I can imagine people using the inversion method, which would put the glass part teetering on top while full of hot water while brewing. That would easily tip over, shatter, and cause unhappy customers.

        • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The inverted method is a bad idea with any version of the AP, the risk of shattering the fancy glass one could be a good deterrent to stop doing it ;D

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The whole 👉 was a cheap easy coffee maker.

      They are cashing in on the microplastics fad. Simps are so easy to sell to.

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Did someone test the aeropress and find lots of microplastics?

      A few people mentioned it here.

      If its a concern, aren’t (e.g.) tupperware and coffee flasks too?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Micro plastics are a concern with all plastic food containers, especially when you’re heating something in them.

        It’s long been a recommendation to not reheat leftovers in plastic

        If you instead use glass or stainless, you don’t have to worry about it. Or in theory they last longer

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the idea is that adding boiling water to something made of plastic probably leaches chemicals.

        As far as Tupperware and coffee flasks go, yes. This is also a concern.

        There’s plenty more research to do about microplastics. I’m sure the plastic aeropress is still significantly better than using soft plastic disposable coffee pods. I’m not a scientist or doctor though so don’t take my word for it.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, all plastic food service items are of concern.

        *Though the studies on harder plastics have been focused on plasticizers leeching into the food or liquid.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Did someone test the aeropress and find lots of microplastics?

        of course not. People read it on Reddit.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, everyone is now scared of micro plastics that have been around for 70 years and no lab has yet to find a mechanism for toxicity. Meanwhile, we have been implanting plastic prosthetics, shunts, pacers, etc. for 70 years and there were no issues.

      Americans love to be scared. BPA doesn’t give you tits either.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          but there have been eye-opening studies if you have been paying attention.

          You picked the wrong guy for this. Junk science in a second rate journal is not eye opening. Correlation is not causation.

          "Compared to adjacent non-cancerous tissues, tumor tissues exhibited a greater variety and distribution of microplastics. "

          Because cancerous tissue does not have the intact structure of normal tissues. They see all kinds of stuff in tumors that the lymphatic system clears out of healthy tissues. That paper does not show HOW plastic polymers could cause tumors, because no one can show this in 50 years of research.

          Again, we have been implanting plastic stents and meshes and prosthetics for 60+ years. The experiment has been done.

          Since this thread is looking for something to be afraid of, look at coffee brewing with and without paper filtration. Filtered brews yield caffeine and compounds healthy for liver functions. Unfiltered coffees contain diterpenes, cafestol and kahweol, which signficantly raise total and LDL cholesterol, which is bad. Actual science, not media driven hype fear.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Let’s assume you’re right (you’re not, but for the sake of argument)

            There are no problems with microplastics. However they are near ubiquitous throughout the environment, across our food chains, in every part of our body. We’re long past the point of being able to clean them up And there are more and more every year.

            Are you really so comfortable that they will never cause problems for ourselves, or any of the millions of types of life forms in our biosphere? That there’s no threshold that’s dangerous? Ever?

            We’re being foolish and short-sighted with our impact on the environment, turning what may not be a problem into if it is, we will have created a worldwide disaster that we can’t do anything about

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    This makes so much more sense than that ridiculous glass version.

    I’m guessing that Aeropress has lost a ton of market share to the Oxo Rapid Brewer (which appears to be superior to the Aeropress in everyway). Aeropress is now scrambling with any and all ideas to try to recall market share.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The aeropress never made coffee well because it used pressure. It excelled at being a faster cafetière/french press with a paper filter and easier clean up. Outside of large metal lever brewers steams they only way to get pressure that will impact a brew significantly. The oxo rapid brew is more mechanically complex, harder to clean and can only brew a limited set of ways the aeropress can. I don’t think it will out compete the aeropress.

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      They address this in the FAQ:

      The number markings are a recognizable part of the AeroPress design and, by including them on Steel, we’re protecting our trademark. To help with fill guidance, the inside of the chamber includes a laser-etched mark at the 5 level that can be seen from above.

      “Protecting trademark”

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t use the numbers at all. I do inverted, and pull the plunger until it’s barely in the cylinder, and fill it from there.

      That makes just enough coffee for a standard 10oz mug.