KEY POINTS

Federal Express sued the U.S. government, seeking a “full refund” of the money the shipping giant paid for tariffs unilaterally imposed by Donald Trump, which the Supreme Court last week ruled were illegal.

FedEx’s suit appears to be the first one filed by a major U.S. company after the Supreme Court decision seeking a refund of the tariffs it has paid.

Other companies filed lawsuits seeking refunds before the high court ruled that the tariffs Trump imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are illegal.

  • 0ndead@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Hey FedEx, you’re gonna refund the customers that you passed those tariffs onto, right?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Real talk…

      I ordered some shit not thinking about tarrifs, and one item from Slovenia where the seller explicitly reached out to say there’s be tariffs and to make sure it was cool since some Americans flipped out…

      I never paid a single tariff.

      Like, when exactly were people getting charged?

      • 0ops@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        the seller explicitly reached out

        The times the seller didn’t do that. A few times now I’ve ordered something with no tariff charges mentioned not realizing that I was ordering out of country only to get an email saying it’s being held by the delivery company, they paid to get it through customs, and won’t deliver until I pay them.

        That’s just things that I’ve bought directly from other countries though. Most goods just have higher prices to cover any tariffs (or just because they can). I promise you even if you haven’t paid a tariff directly, you’re still paying.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Weird, it was just the first sentence at first.

          ordered something with no tariff charges mentioned not realizing that I was ordering out of country only to get an email saying it’s being held by the delivery company, they paid to get it through customs, and won’t deliver until I pay them.

          Yeah, that’s what I expected, didn’t happen tho.

          I promise you even if you haven’t paid a tariff directly, you’re still paying.

          I know it raised the prices of things in America, but I meant explicitly ordering things from other countries that should have been tariffed, and no one ever tariffed me

          • Denixen@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Could be that the delivery service absorbed the cost in order to not scare its customers. Might have raised their service fees instead.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It kind of amazes me that you’ve managed to navigate the previous year without understanding this but…

        You’ve been paying the tariffs every time you consume anything at all, it’s just that no one called you to inform you that some component of what you’ve paid is a tariff.

        Suppose there are 2 brands of toothbrush at the shop, one from China and one from the US. They’re equivalent in every way and last year they were $1 each. Since the tariffs, goods from China have attracted a 50% (?) tariff, so if the cost price is $0.90, then the new cost is $1.35, plus a markup for the shop and that’s $1.50. The problem, if it’s not already obvious, is that the US producer can just increase the price of their toothbrushes to $1.35.

        The really daft part is, the US producer’s costs will have increased with tariffs in the same way, and their employees spending power will have decreased.

        As an aside, IIRC you’ve often opined that voting for Kamala would have been tantamount to supporting genocide. I think we might have had some discussions around that. Your comment provides a fascinating insight into the kind of cognitive ability that supports that position, so thank you for that.

      • Xraygoggles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Hey just a shot in the dark here, but was it a puzzle book? My favorite puzzle book guy is from Slovenia.

      • Davel23@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I ordered a PC from China a couple of weeks ago. I got an email saying they were declaring the item’s value to be $80 to mitigate tariffs. I expected to have to pay something when it arrived, but it was just dropped at my doorstep like any other delivery.