AI and legal experts told the FT this “memorization” ability could have serious ramifications on AI groups’ battle against dozens of copyright lawsuits around the world, as it undermines their core defense that LLMs “learn” from copyrighted works but do not store copies.
Sam Altman would like to remind you each Old Lady at a Library consume 284 cubic feet of Oxygen a day from the air.
Also, hey at least they made sure to probably destroy the physical copy they ripped into their hopelessly fragmented CorpoNapster fever dream, the law is the law.
I didn’t cheat on you, I just didn’t realize I was making love to an entirely different woman! They are different OK!!!
That’s a interesting question. Think of the Star Trek holodeck. If someone creates a perfect holodeck recreation of their own partner, and sleeps with that simulation, is that cheating on their partner? Let’s assume it’s not one of those fancy sentient holograms like the doctor, just a regular mindless one.
what if they are the doctor and have sex with a ghost?
That’s just a good old Blazin’ time
I prefer Blazin’ with Bev’
Bev is implied when one is already Blazin’
Eh I would say it’s masturbating to a “picture” of their partner. It’s just a sexy light show. As long as it’s not sentient it can never have feelings back so it’s just a sex toy. Ever hear of a clone-a-willy?
As with a picture, the important part is consent. Was the picture/3D model created with informed consent from the partner that it might reasonably be used for masturbation? If so, then not cheating. Otherwise it is.