Kulyk legally entered the U.S. in late 2023 along with his wife, 38, and daughter, who’s now 5. The family was sponsored by U.S. citizens as part of the Uniting 4 Ukraine program, a humanitarian program set up in April 2022 to allow Ukrainians fleeing Russia’s war to live and work in the U.S. on “parole.”

Once the initial two-year parole period expires, entrants can file for re-parole to remain in the country longer. That’s exactly what Kulyk says he did. His wife and daughter’s applications were approved. But his remained pending.

He said he was putting groceries in his car on Jan. 1 when he was approached by three ICE agents.

“I explained to the ICE officers that the war was killing people, that my wife had a disability, that it was violence, terrorism which we had escaped from but one of them began to laugh,” Kulyk told The Daily Beast. “I asked why he was laughing and I was told that he was pro-Russian, wanted Russia to win the war.”

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This new brand of authoritarians are so far from capitalism anyway lol. We’ve got a kleptocracy like Russia. There is not capitalism here.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Capitalism is simply private ownership of the means of production. That’s literally the only defining attribute. Theoretically capitalism works best with complete market freedom, but since that inevitably leads to monopoly, the most successful capitalist nations have always had a strong regulatory state to prevent the ruling class from destroying the world in their greed-fueled feeding frenzies.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, key characteristics include profit motive and competitive markets driving economic exchange. You and Milton Friedman bot acknowledge it needs strong regulatory guardrails and income redistribution to prevent the capitalists from taking over the government/world. Citizens united (2010). So back to my argument of ‘no capitalist, kleptocracy’. We barely have a functioning government to enforce ownership and they are stealing everything they can. It’s a kleptocracy. or as I like to call it 7 monopolies in a trench coat. trump just took 10% of Intel because he could. The capitalist is the government, the government is the capitalist, we no longer have competitive markets, people no longer work for profit they work to not starve. Capitalism is dead. Long live what ever this shit is.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Kleptocracy, as you call it, is literally just capitalism functioning as intended. Since the end of feudalism there has never been separation between capitalist and government, because they’ve always had control of the means of production, hence control over the economy, hence control over whoever the fuck they want. There have been some few times in history where workers were able to secure rights for themselves in exchange for not fully going revolution, but in between those times, capitalists have always tried to crawl back those rights and secure even more for themselves, and they do it legally, by owning the media and the politicians. This is basic political-economy theory stuff, not some Milton Friedman Neo-capitalist apologia bullshit. Literally none of his ideas have led to the betterment of societies, can’t we just abandon Chicago school of economics already?

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Nothing had gotten better since when now? Like nothing at all in humanity has improved since what year?

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I did not say that nothing has improved, I said that none of Friedman’s ideas have been the cause of improvement. In fact, many of them have been a great hindrance to the global betterment of humanity.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Global poverty, access to medicine, more free movement for people, global connections. Decline in regional conflicts, Idk I think the world has improved a lot of ways in the last 50 years. The USA may be in a serious decline right now, but the world is still pretty solid and will go on without us for better or worse.

                • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  All of those progresses are despite neoliberalism, not because of it. Neoliberalism is great at one thing only - concentrating wealth in the hands of the already wealthy. If there was no resistance to neoliberalism, we’d already be living in dystopia instead of rapidly approaching it.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                So the prevailing economic theory of the world in the last 50 years has done nothing. Where have the improvements come from?