UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1527arrow-down128
arrow-up1499arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down1·3 months agoThat’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·3 months agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-23 months agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 months agoclaude is gaud
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 months agoRote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
claude is gaud
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.