UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoNo judgement here. Have fun with life yalllemmy.mlimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1113arrow-down1imageNo judgement here. Have fun with life yalllemmy.mlUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEtherWhack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 month agoDon’t you need ≥60% for ethanol to even be effective? Like to actually denature the pathogen.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 month agoFor food safety standards probably. For an otherwise healthy person it’s probably good enough.
minus-squareRedSnt 🧩♂️👓🖥️@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoIt’s a good point. And a quick search gave 60% or higher if one wanted to really sterilize. Apparently below that it depends on the strain of bacteria and how sensitive they are to alcohol.
Don’t you need ≥60% for ethanol to even be effective? Like to actually denature the pathogen.
For food safety standards probably. For an otherwise healthy person it’s probably good enough.
It’s a good point. And a quick search gave 60% or higher if one wanted to really sterilize. Apparently below that it depends on the strain of bacteria and how sensitive they are to alcohol.