Scene with Jesus on the cross. A MAGA person wearing a thin blue line flag shirt pointing at Jesus saying “He should have just obeyed the law!”

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6日前

    The idea is that he could have, but it was through his suffering that mankind would be saved. I’m not a believer but from a literary perspective, the story is that if he saved himself, all humanity would suffer. His human nature wanted to survive and avoid suffering but to do so would go against God’s will and humanity would not be absolved of sin. He overcame his human nature to embrace the will of God. Hence his prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane, “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will”

    By the way, the nails actually go through the wrists in crucifixion, between the bones (radius and ulna). If you put the nails through the palms like they so often show, the weight of the body would just make them rip through the meat of the hands between the fingers.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5日前

      Right, but God could have just not created him in the first place. The entire plan to send himself to earth as a human is insanely convoluted and makes no sense when you’re literally all powerful.

      • Manjushri@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5日前

        Well, that’s why I look at it solely from a literary perspective. The whole idea of creating mankind, while knowing the whole future of everyone who will ever exist, and then punishing humanity because one of the very first people created failed to obey his rules, something God knew they would do, is simply absurd. But as a story it’s interesting.

        The whole premise of the God in the Bible makes little sense. To quote Epicurus:

        “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.

        Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.

        Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?

        Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

        Omnipotence, Omniscience, Benevolence. Choose any two.