• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    356
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why?

    Why is every company right now making it impossible to understand what their app does?

    I swear to fucking god, I’ve been looking for SAAS products at work to fill a role, they’re all branded as AI and not what the companies actually fucking do.

    Office has like a 40 year plus reputation as THE office suite. What the fuck us copilot? That cheap knockoff OpenAI they debuted before it was really?

    • PostProcess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      208
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because AI on its own doesn’t actually make a return, but by conflating the AI investment with a genuine productivity tool that’s making money, you can start to hide your poor choices.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wow, you are right. This is a way for them to pump the bubble and their stock price up even more.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        they are trying hard to peddle it to govt usage since they are likely a guaranteed revenue stream, things like palintir is being peddle hard by thiel to multiple countries.(including israel and defense contracting)

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s because when so much money/power has pushed so long for people to make decisions based on money and not logic, we’ve now arrived at the point where even “the emperor’s new clothes” type moments can’t rein in the insanity; executives are bonused off this garbage and most employees who do know better–thanks to orgs’ own internal propaganda and structures–have given up caring and just publish the garbage and clock out(as they should).

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I assume it’s for the CEO benefit. “Look boss, we’re pushing AI like you wanted”

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think I know why. Microsoft Office was a product. Their new strategy is Services. They want you to lease their services and have vendor lock-in forever. It takes a long time for businesses to migrate.

      This has MBA written all over it. The idea that AI can just do whatever the client needs means that you can say your service does it all!

      It is a scam.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I think I know why. Microsoft Office was a product. Their new strategy is Services. They want you to lease their services and have vendor lock-in forever. It takes a long time for businesses to migrate.

        They already did/do that and it’s called Office 365 and already have vendor lock-in with Windows, SSO services, Azure, etc

      • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s going to fall apart and the industries using the tools are going to adopt a Unix philosophy of dedicated tools that do a specific job well. May take a Butlerian Jihad, but it will happen.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It’s already happening, in part because of this and in part because of the unstable, unpredictable US government.

          Several European countries are looking towards investing in open source as a way to get away from American big tech because they’re suddenly considering US sanctions against them a real possibility, or at least a real threat.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Ayup. Why build your company on a service with a US company when they can - and have - fuck you on a whim?

            With standalone installs you can keep trucking. Service as subscription? That’s going to very quickly start dying off as the world destabilises.

      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve seen people mention it elsewhere in this thread. But what is MBA? I get nothing relevant when I search for it.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      Copilot is love, copilot is life. It’s okay friend - these are copilot times, but I still copilot you.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      FWIW, Office (or more accurately, everything that was part of Office) was renamed Microsoft 365 years ago, in 2020. That was long before the AI insanity.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Shouldn’t it be called Microsoft 250? There are 250 working days in a year. As soon as I’m home I’m using Thunderbird or Libreoffice, certainly not the product formerly known as Microsoft Office.

    • vin@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They stopped promoting “Office” brand when they saw success with Microsoft 365 and dropped Office 365. This was quite some time ago. Now they have just renamed an “app” called “Office” which was like a homescreen for Microsoft 365. I doubt anyone really used it and no one on lemmy seems to even recognize it.

      • moopet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I didn’t know Microsoft 365 and Office 365 were different things. From the outside, it’s as opaque as Apple’s version names.

        • vin@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Microsoft 365 bundles other products too like Windows and online Exchange. Guess it was confusing to have both office only and office plus others, and hence they dropped the office only.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s not about the user.

      (it’s about sounding innovative and cool with whichever trend to the brainless money people aka shareholders)

  • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ok so there are 3 microsoft products called copilot now. Surely this won’t confuse anyone

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Are you including Github Copilot in that count? Technically that’s a Microsoft product. It’s probably the only Copilot that’s actually useful.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        6 days ago

        A controversial take. Every new feature added to Github has made it more unpleasant to use, and a lot of that is down to Copilot, for me. Only way to get rid of it is to wait for Github to go down again, which is the only thing it does reliably at the moment.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 days ago

          I get the Pro version for free since I’ve worked on a few popular open-source projects. I’m using it in VS Code and it’s helped me write code for systems I’m unfamiliar with. I’ve used it to summarize the architecture of open-source projects so I understand how to contribute new features. The autocompletion can be pretty good too. I also use it to review my code.

          We use Claude Code with the Opus 4.5 model at work, and it’s quite a bit better, but I don’t want to pay that much for an AI model for personal projects since I use it so infrequently.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Every new feature added to Github has made it more unpleasant to use

          Free private repositories, Github Actions, and Github Packages are all pretty useful though. All of those were added under Microsoft’s ownership. Actions got a head start because it was built on top of Azure DevOps infra that Microsoft had already created.

          • moopet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            Free private repos were always available on Bitbucket (for example) before that though. The things added by Microsoft were all catch-up.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              They lose money from it (people that used to pay for an account to get private repos no longer need to) which is why Github didn’t do it when they were independent.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Plenty of open-source projects that I use are happy with them though. I see far fewer projects using Travis CI and AppVeyor these days for example.

        • Xylight‮@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          github also has the slowest, most unresponsive web interface ive ever used. it’s genuinely impressive how they made a web app so slow

        • utopiah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          controversial take.

          Nope, I agree, and so far you get only upvotes so… we agree.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      How the hell else are PMs going to get positive reviews this quarter? Waiting for Excel, Word, Powerpoint and Windows to all be called Copilot

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    6 days ago

    Damn, our customers don’t use copilot, but we promised to reach 50% usage in 2026…

    That’s it… Rename the whole thing to copilot and we achieve our goal!

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      As a south american, it’s already being a nightmare. I’ve been enduring a heat index of about 44 to 46ºC, and now the tension from the us invasion in a neighbor country

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      On the bright side, this change has been around for 9 months at least because they had already changed it when I was doing IT stuff at my last job and it was impossible to find where to actually download the office suite.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had that feeling just before new year.

      These are actually my predictions for 2026 :

      • More stupid AI integration into products, because money.
      • More stupid geopolitcs and war.
  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    6 days ago

    Why couldn’t they just stick with Office… It’s 100% explanatory, short, and to the point.

    365 never made sense to me. Is it supposed to represent the year? Like available 24/7 but instead it’s there for you 365 days of the year? And if that’s the case why the fuck would I care? It’s software, of course it’s available to me whenever I want. It’s not a 7/11 hotdog rotisserie.

  • DustyRockford@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    6 days ago

    Microsoft is reporting over 600 MILLION user growth on copilot, basically overnight! Wow, very impressive Mr Nadella. You’ve truly pushed AI adoption forward. Someone get this man a bonus!

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It’s been named “Microsoft Office” since 1990. Way to piss 35 years of brand recognition up a wall.

    How drunk are these guys?

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      6 days ago

      How drunk are these guys?

      Ask the dude that renamed Twitter to X (formerly Twitter).

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      What’s funny is their attempts to rebrand Office have just fallen completely flat. Kind of reminds me of when Willis Group bought the naming rights to Sears Tower and all the Chicagoan’s were just collectively like, “Yeah, No. We’re still going to call it ‘Sears Tower’.” Hell, nobody that I know of calls it “Willis Tower.” Nobody calls Microsoft Office “Office 365”. Nobody is going to call it “Microsoft 365 Copilot.” This is just a huge waste of effort by a tech firm that has long since run out of ways to be innovative.

  • LordMayor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Let’s take the most recognizable software package name and make it something totally divorced from what the software is supposed to be for.”

    There are probably people for whom Microsoft Office is the only desktop software that they use. There are probably many people in procurement that are going to scratch their heads and think twice about signing off on something that sounds like a flight simulator.

    This is an opportunity for alternate office suites.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Its is almost universally the main reason that even a lot of Linux daily-drivers still have a windows install available to them. They fuck up Office enough and there isn’t a reason to even have Windows for most users.

      That’s why they want you to put all your stuff in their dumb cloud, because its the only reason people would keep using this garbage, because they can hold your work ransom in their shitty ecosystem.

      That is the whole business model of tech now. Stealing your shit and selling it back to you. That is it.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Do what I did: vm your win machine inside linux. It’s how i solved my legacy software / game saves quandry. Just duplicated the win HDD and virtualised it.

        I dislike dual booting and will go a looong way to be lazy :P

          • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            They don’t just use office from the web, via Linux? You can access excel, word, …, all of that in a browser.

            I would not shut down my PC and boot into windows just for office. I keep my Windows around because my wife prefers it (for now).

            • Sinuousity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m not one of the dual booters mentioned, but the desktop version of Excel specifically has several important features that the online version flat out doesn’t support. Primarily I’m talking about creating and running data queries, which is useful for analyzing data and generating reports from remote data sources including external files like CSV and online databases. You can do all this without Excel of course, but this shows the online versions are definitely limited.

              • Taleya@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                'Twas ever so. Years ago (2012) when i was still working in an office we had web MS office to use for work…i ended up bringing in my laptop with full blown office just to get the fckn data manipulation we needed out of excel

              • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s fair. I’ve dealt with that before, and in my case I had to rebuild the damn thing for compatibility with the web version. When I did, I was able to use alternatives like Power Query M instead of VBA. This worked in my case, but I’m sure you’re right that some features just aren’t there in any capacity.

                The external CSV thing is a PITA but you can (at least there) overcome it via adding a “landing sheet” for raw data. Nobody is going to want to deal with any of this, though.

            • Pamasich@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              They don’t just use office from the web, via Linux? You can access excel, word, …, all of that in a browser.

              Web office has barely any features compared to the desktop thing, iirc.

            • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Yeah I think I’d be more likely to use WinBoat or something similar to run a virtual machine rather than fully boot into Windows.

            • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              office on the web sucks, lacks features, and basically defeats the purpose of using office at all

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t know many people that still call it “Microsoft Office”… They usually refer to the individual apps they use (Word, Excel) rather than the suite as a whole.

      Some people just call it “Microsoft” (“please install Microsoft on my computer”), especially if they’re on MacOS where it’s the only Microsoft software they use.

      Some people assume it’s part of Windows since they’ve only ever used computers that have had it preinstalled.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s like they’re trying to alienate their core customer base. Windows 8 may have been salvageable but Office is not.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      For business, they’re locked into Excel, there is no substitute. I can see MS blowing out the remaining home users though.

  • damo_omad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    6 days ago

    Office is the last good branding Microsoft have and they’re just getting rid of it, I can’t believe it

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Suicidally bad naming is the one thing we can always rely on Microsoft for

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Good?

      It’s godawful, to the point of being barely functional

      My company runs on office and I write everything in Google drive, then export it to a word document and import it into office because working on office web is just a joke.

      Seriously.

      Sometimes it just randomly and quietly deletes some text I just typed

      Sometimes it just changes layouts on other pages where I’m not even working

      Sometimes it says it saved the work and it saved didly squat

      I see Microsoft office as something that only “enterprise” level customers would be stupid enough to use and to pay actual money for.