• edinbruh@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Right, let me rephrase “no Firefox fork worth using has any chance to maintain meaningful existence without upstream Firefox”

    I’m sure many forks will go on surviving from scraps if Firefox disappeared tomorrow. But they wouldn’t get anything useful done.

    Let me put this into perspective, Microsoft (a trillion dollar company that would benefit enormously from rolling their own browser engine) didn’t have the resources for maintaining a browser engine.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      See related: pfsense and opnsense.

      Its entirely possible for a fork to survive if the cause is supported. Both things can still exist provided there is interest and support.

      Switching browsers isn’t hard. For now, personally, I’ll take the fork that isn’t trying to literally be the “yo dog…” meme.

    • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A for-profit company “not having resources” usually means that the product department decided it’s not worth investing. Doesn’t tell us anything about the actual effort required to maintain such a software.

      • edinbruh@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, but you can think for yourself and you and Amy product manager know how much they would benefit (just as much as Google and Apple, other for profit companies of the same caliber) and you know they would have the means to produce such software (just like Apple and Google). So, knowing that they still decided it’s not worth the investment, you can infer that the cost would be immense.

        Also, all the other points still stand.