Campfyre
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day ago

Loops publishes their recommender algorithm

pixelfed.social

external-link
message-square
38
fedilink
330
external-link

Loops publishes their recommender algorithm

pixelfed.social

FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day ago
message-square
38
fedilink
loops (@[email protected])
pixelfed.social
external-link
Our new For You algorithm is pretty complex, so we created this infographic to make it easier to understand! #Loops #ForYou #TikTok #EthicalAlgorithms
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This infographic reeks of AI slop.

    • newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      What about it?

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    This is outstanding!

    Not being based on “rengagement” or “monetization” means it’s purely interest-based, with a touch of serendipity.

    One of BSKY’s distinctive features was to have “pluggable” algorithms. Fediverse would do well to support it so people who are not into the technical weeds could choose how their feed is curated.

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Yeah after making an algorithm for peertube I’m gonna say this is too complicated to implement. That graphic might be the the plan and it’s something more simplistic.

    Making a simple cosign vector for peertube was a pain

    • newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      What’s too complicated exactly? They claim their program does precisely that. I believe you could review the code yourself.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well. This is good news.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can you personalize your own ranking algo that can be shared with friends? That’s the breakthrough we’re all waiting for…

    • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not that I know of, but you could make a feature request if one doesn’t already exist https://github.com/joinLoops

    • Da Oeuf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be extremely groovy. Even just having a few flavours of algorithm that you can choose from would be really cool.

    • ‮redirtSdeR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      that’s kinda how bluesky works with the feeds and all

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t loops open source?

    • 4Robato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes

      • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        So then this is just a shorter explanation, and not “publishing” the algorithm? Because before already anyone could read the code and understand how it works, it would have just taken longer.

        • FarraigePlaisteaċ (sé/é)@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I suppose that by using the word “publish”, I made it sound like the algorithm had been private until this point. I could probably have chosen a better phrasing like “published breakdown illustration”.

        • FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          69
          ·
          1 day ago

          Technically, yes the info would be available but not everyone is able to read code so this is a welcome additional bit of info and transparency. I also see it as an example of how future open source social media platforms can promote and demonstrate the way their algorithms work as opposed to the black boxes of proprietary web apps like Instagram etc (which, while not algorithmically transparent or open, have been pretty well established to have algorithms that prioritize maximizing time on platform and engagement over all else with some serious negative repercussions for that).

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          1 day ago

          anyone could read the code and understand how it works

          “Anyone” is doing some heavy lifting here.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Sorry for being pedantic since your comment is true anyway, but “could” is the one doing the heavy lifting.

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Personally, I would not be able to understand this, looking at the code (or any code). I appreciere that they shared a visualization of it. If you’re hung up on the word “publish” instead of “share”, “posts” or “shows”, then I think its redundant

        • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The same way “anyone” could make an HTML5 compliant browser. The reality is you can’t do it unless Google lets you.

  • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Hoping for something like this for PeerTube and personal customisation of the algorithm.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I can’t even zoom into the picture on mobile on this website

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 day ago

      this is from the post, that this post links to

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Cooool

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Loops… Algorithm???

    • harmbugler@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      … yes?

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That is surprising for those who have a long familiarity with Loops. The chronological timeline was a major selling point.

        • harmbugler@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          From https://joinloops.org/

          A calm chronological Following feed for the people you trust — and a For You feed that surfaces new creators from across Loops and compatible ActivityPub servers.

  • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Loops kind of sucks.

    • harmbugler@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Compared to…?

    • korendian@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s kind of in beta.

    • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      No u

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, tell me I’m wrong. Tell me that there is good content. Tell me it functions well.

        • ByteMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s still in early stages. Give it time :)

        • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s literally in its infant stages. You think any of the major social media sites just started out with a bajillion accounts and a neverending feed? I remember signing up for Facebook and Instagram in the very early days. It looked like the fediverse.

        • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You can do something about the content 😊

          • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I tried. The UI sucks.

        • Remy Rose@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the stuff i post is pretty neat… Ben Glish is on there now too, that’s cool!

Fediverse@lemmy.world

fediverse@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it’s related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 492 users / day
  • 1.6K users / week
  • 2.92K users / month
  • 12.6K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 38.3K subscribers
  • 2.91K Posts
  • 95.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ruud@lemmy.world
  • Xilly@lemmy.world
  • MrCenny@lemmy.world
  • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
  • AutoMod - Beta@lemmy.world
  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org