fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 13 days agoGlassmander.xyzimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down111
arrow-up1594arrow-down1imageGlassmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareTheOakTree@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-212 days agoIf water could no have its surface tension broken (surface tension becomes infinity), wouldn’t all non-reactive production of gaseous water cease to occur?
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agoread [email protected] comment at this post
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-212 days agoIndeed, my own comment was originally going to be a reply to this comment.
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agowhoops, i now see i misread your use of “gaseous water”. What you mean is water vapor or steam … well, this would not escape liquid water
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 days agoi felt that it answered your question : gases becoming non-soluble in water means they cannot diffuse to go in water
minus-squarewolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-212 days agoI’m the other guy, wolframhydroxide. my comment was originally going to be a response to this person.
minus-squareA_A@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agowhoops, indeed i missidentified you. Good thing that you saw through my confusion.
If water could no have its surface tension broken (surface tension becomes infinity), wouldn’t all non-reactive production of gaseous water cease to occur?
read [email protected] comment at this post
Indeed, my own comment was originally going to be a reply to this comment.
whoops, i now see i misread your use of “gaseous water”. What you mean is water vapor or steam … well, this would not escape liquid water
i felt that it answered your question : gases becoming non-soluble in water means they cannot diffuse to go in water
I’m the other guy, wolframhydroxide. my comment was originally going to be a response to this person.
whoops, indeed i missidentified you. Good thing that you saw through my confusion.