SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 4か月前Guess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1570arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1535arrow-down1imageGuess it was truelemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to memes@lemmy.world · 4か月前message-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4か月前Assuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4か月前 spherical point That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-24か月前Sphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4か月前But then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
minus-squarewischi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4か月前Black holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
minus-squareCannonFodder@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4か月前Yeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
minus-squarerenegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4か月前deleted by creator
Assuming the baby is a spherical point mass in a vacuum is so 101.
That’s a new kind of math, definitely not 101.
Sphere with radius zero. Problem solved 🤣
But then quantum mechanics are significant, and you have black hole.
Black holes are GR and it wouldn’t make the calculations much different. Take the moon for example, the orbit would be exactly the same no matter if earth is a rocky planet, a black hole or a point mass.
Yeah, but how are you gonna throw a black hole baby?
deleted by creator