Go ahead and tell me how you would explain what 3(x+y) means without referring to Multiplication?
Your own spammed screenshots say 3 gets multiplied.
There is no special case. You made it up. 8+0 equals 8 (or sorry, does it just mean 8?) so 2(8+0)2 is the same as 2(8)2. The latter is the next step in simplifying the former. You’ve admitted simplifying first is valid, when your nose was rubbed in your own found PDFs doing exactly that.
You don’t have an opinion. You make no claim, anymore. All you have left are derision and emojis. You’ve admitted 2(8*1)2 means 2(8)(8), and insist that’s different from 2(8)2 because… ibid. You cannot explain it even now.
Nope! If you looked more carefully you’ll find some of them are photo’s and scans. You also seem to be forgetting that every modern textbook comes with a PDF as well 🙄
From which you are ignoring counterexamples using a(b+c)n. Fraud
says the actual fraud who keeps ignoring that there is no exponent in a(b+c) 😂
Go ahead and tell me how you would explain what 3(x+y) means without referring to Multiplication?
Your own spammed screenshots say 3 gets multiplied
So in other words, you weren’t able to. Also, it doesn’t say that - well done on missing the point for a third time in a row 😂
There is no special case
So you think 2(3x4x5)=(2x3x2x4x2x5) is totally fine? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA 😂😂😂
You made it up
Weird then that it’s in Maths textbooks isn’t it, that 2(3x4x5) is in fact only equal to 2(60)? 😂
does it just mean 8?
says person showing they don’t know the difference in meaning between “means” and “equals” 😂
so 2(8+0)2 is the same as 2(8)2
Yep.
The latter is the next step in simplifying the former
Yep.
You’ve admitted simplifying first is valid
Yep.
when your nose was rubbed in your own found PDFs doing exactly that
Nope! When you finally discovered that they were both valid, even though only a couple of textbooks I posted specifically said to Distribute first. We in fact teach students to simplify before Distributing - less working out, less mistakes with signs.
You don’t have an opinion
That’s right, just facts, as per Maths textbooks 😂
You make no claim, anymore
a(b+c)=(ab+ac), same thing I’ve been saying the whole time
All you have left are derision and emojis
and facts
You’ve admitted 2(8*1)2 means 2(8)(8)
Nope! Never said anything of the sort, liar. I have said the whole time that Multiplication is a special case, to which you claimed there was no special case.
insist that’s different from 2(8)2 because…
No Multiplication. It’s not complicated 🙄
You cannot explain it even now
I already did. Not my fault you don’t understand the difference between Addition and Multiplication 😂
PDFs found online. From which you are ignoring counterexamples using a(b+c)n. Fraud.
Your own spammed screenshots say 3 gets multiplied.
There is no special case. You made it up. 8+0 equals 8 (or sorry, does it just mean 8?) so 2(8+0)2 is the same as 2(8)2. The latter is the next step in simplifying the former. You’ve admitted simplifying first is valid, when your nose was rubbed in your own found PDFs doing exactly that.
You don’t have an opinion. You make no claim, anymore. All you have left are derision and emojis. You’ve admitted 2(8*1)2 means 2(8)(8), and insist that’s different from 2(8)2 because… ibid. You cannot explain it even now.
Nope! If you looked more carefully you’ll find some of them are photo’s and scans. You also seem to be forgetting that every modern textbook comes with a PDF as well 🙄
says the actual fraud who keeps ignoring that there is no exponent in a(b+c) 😂
So in other words, you weren’t able to. Also, it doesn’t say that - well done on missing the point for a third time in a row 😂
So you think 2(3x4x5)=(2x3x2x4x2x5) is totally fine? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA 😂😂😂
Weird then that it’s in Maths textbooks isn’t it, that 2(3x4x5) is in fact only equal to 2(60)? 😂
says person showing they don’t know the difference in meaning between “means” and “equals” 😂
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Nope! When you finally discovered that they were both valid, even though only a couple of textbooks I posted specifically said to Distribute first. We in fact teach students to simplify before Distributing - less working out, less mistakes with signs.
That’s right, just facts, as per Maths textbooks 😂
a(b+c)=(ab+ac), same thing I’ve been saying the whole time
and facts
Nope! Never said anything of the sort, liar. I have said the whole time that Multiplication is a special case, to which you claimed there was no special case.
No Multiplication. It’s not complicated 🙄
I already did. Not my fault you don’t understand the difference between Addition and Multiplication 😂