LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square273fedilinkarrow-up1682arrow-down156
arrow-up1626arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square273fedilink
minus-squareViperActual@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 hours ago2+5(8-5) For anyone wanting to see a different way of solving it with distribution: 2+58-55 2+40-25 42-25 17 So long as you follow the basic math rules, you can solve it in many different ways to get the same result.
minus-squaresin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoWith formatting fixed: 2+5*8-5*5 2+40-25 42-25 17
minus-squareCheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 hours agouse backslashes pefore asterisks so that the markdown parser won’t think you inted to write in italics \*like this\* *like this*
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 hours agoWorth a reminder that *'s get converted to italics. At first I saw the 2+58-55 and was very concerned for your education.
2+5(8-5)
For anyone wanting to see a different way of solving it with distribution:
2+58-55 2+40-25 42-25 17
So long as you follow the basic math rules, you can solve it in many different ways to get the same result.
With formatting fixed:
use backslashes pefore asterisks so that the markdown parser won’t think you inted to write in italics
\*like this\**like this*
Worth a reminder that *'s get converted to italics. At first I saw the 2+58-55 and was very concerned for your education.