Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoSensory issuesslrpnk.netimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down129
arrow-up1470arrow-down1imageSensory issuesslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoYour argument is valid, but your approach is wrong.
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoLess absolutist in laying out the argument. He comes off as ‘once again I’m proven right’ which isn’t a great way to get a point across. I get the frustration, certainly, but it just shuts down discussion rather than fostering it
Your argument is valid, but your approach is wrong.
What other approach do you suggest?
Less absolutist in laying out the argument. He comes off as ‘once again I’m proven right’ which isn’t a great way to get a point across.
I get the frustration, certainly, but it just shuts down discussion rather than fostering it