It potentially is a fake “cover” article, literally an article made to deluge the internet search index with the keywords “epstein” and “trump” but with a less heinous and more confusing, not damning headline (the only thing most people read). Thus anybody searching for the keywords in the future will find nothing (in the first page of google, bing, or brainrot character generator matrix of your choice)
Apparently they do this quite a lot in UK, i’ve heard (Boris). Once you know it, you see it a lot.
Just reading the actual “article” is usually wild, quality worse than tabloids, and you’re left confused, because why would someone spend time and effort writing an article that is not interesting in any way, completely unfounded, just plain nothing. Well, the reason is usually they did have a reason, and the reason was money and malicious. These days it’s most likely AI slop.
Love to see all the liberals coming out and thinking homophobia and misogyny is fair game just because it’s someone we all despise.
These smearing tactics just make me roll my eyes. How about I don’t know… focusing on the fact that both of these men are monsters and that they raped women and children? I think that is enough to get the point across.
I have seen countless posts on here and on redlib that it makes me fucking sick these people would consider themselves progressive. I mean fuck the leftist subreddit had someone that had a sketch implying that trump was taking women’s jobs by sucking bill’s dick. With about 70-100 upvotes. That’s just fucking misogyny!
Don’t even come at me with the “it’s funny cause he is homophobic” type shit. Guess what buddy! It makes you homophobic too! If someone who is trans commits a crime that doesn’t automatically give me the right to be transphobic or misgender them. At that point you feed into the right and homophobes arguments. You make them valid, “look they even say it too when it’s someone they don’t like.”
For fuck sake get it together people.
You just described the tolerance paradox.
Saying he’s bi curious is not an insult unless you think being bi curious is insulting. It’s only harmful to his base and homophobes everyone else just finds it hilariously hypocritical.
At this point you should filter news through AI to get rid of such spam.
I mean, we’re definitely converging towards that. To even get the web usable, we’ll need ublock-style (human curated) slop trackers as a first layer, then some kind of local agent double checking for obvious spam.
Our first LGBT president ! 🏳️🌈 We should all rejoice, peace and harmony is coming
I think you mean our second, because this makes Bill the first.
There’s as much evidence that Obama had gay sex with a homeless man.
I fully understand just how much people hate Trump. Please report or challenge any comments that are homophobic, or have an anti LGBT angle. Him being a monster isnt an excuse for it
Totally okay to make fun of a homophobe for being a hypocrite. But also on that note, this
Matters what you’re saying. Dude blowing another dude isn’t bad. A homophobe being revealed to have done gay stuff IS hilarious.
So a closeted homosexual person targets and hurts other homosexual people for being open.
Internalized hate is a thing.
It should be called out for being homophobic too.
And it is monster behaviour.
Overt VS covert behaviour isn’t an excuse to pick the side of the monster here. In fact it is monster behaviour in itself because it’s Abuse by proxy.
Tap for spoiler
Please use spoilers or mark NSFL
yeah great thanks for that mental image
Anything to distract from the fact that he definitely had sex with children.
It harkens back to when the GOP were clutching pearls over bills BJ.
Trump has done everything the GOP whine about democrats doing and they line up to metaphorically jerk him off. It only makes sense they be reminded of all the damage they’ve done to this country in their quest for power.
Big Beautiful Bill, obviously AII’m cautiously optimistic about all this, but it feels very much like 9 years ago when pizzagate broke.
Apparently, Bill likes getting his dick sucked—not to an unhealthy degree—but to a history altering degree.
Wouldn’t it be wild if two different presidents were impeached, a quarter century apart, because Bill Clinton got his dick sucked?
Wouldn’t it be wild if dick sucking got him and not raping children because americans hate one of these things nore than the other?
Yuuup
Up there with Genghis Khan’s on the Mount Rushmore of world altering penises.
Although, I don’t really see what’s impeachable about this, but I also know that the right doesn’t seem happy and the rules don’t matter anyway so hey.
There’s gotta be a numbers joke here I’m not smart enough to come up with.
PoV, you live in a Wattpad story.
Fuck, if 2 not quite video essays on the topic have it right, this means Im bound to be pegged at some point, and I don’t want to reach the ending.
Oh come on, it’s just now getting funny. It’s horrific still with other things, but this is funny.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-freezes-as-man-collapses-right-behind-him-in-oval-office/
Why does it look like Donny’s photoshopped in this pic? xD
There are numerous angles of this. I think it’s because he didn’t give one shit about the guy falling and was very disappointed he couldn’t announce his thing.
Seriously. I’m so here for milking the lolz from this for as long as possible.
That’s technically what Maga voters think too 🤷
Meanwhile, while everyone is talking about the trump/clinton trist:
