Hi!

Someone asked me to revive their 20 year old laptop as its no longer working on their installation of windows XP.

This baby has around 512MB of Ram, 1.6 GHZ Intel Atom.

This is my first time doing something with hardware older than myself so I’d love some insight from people around.

  • Akatsuki Levi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    One thing you could try is Alpine Linux It is surprisingly lightweight, and pair it with something like OpenBox or maybe XFCE, and it might be quite good

  • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    MX Linux.
    It can run in in pretty much all hardware, and it’s debian-based too! It has Libreoffice, Firefox, etc. by default.

    Heck; if you can’t install it, you can just use is persistently from the USB!

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I would usually recommend Linux Mint, but damn that thing belongs in a museum!

    Hell, why not put an antique OS like Windows XP for that antique piece of beauty?

    • Gonzako@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      It’s running windows XP but it’s currently unable to use any browsers as the user wants to use it for

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        There are workarounds but i’d discourage you from trying.
        Go linux,

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is the answer. Tiny Core is absolute best for old hardware as it gets running upto speed quickly takes very little resources and you can see what kind of resources it consumes and can add things to it to make it useful.

      • BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Doesn’t Tiny Core load into RAM? With 512 MB that could be a problem. There are many versions of Puppy Linux. I think they load into RAM also. I would try MX Linux and see if that worked. Expanding the amount of RAM would be helpful, but it is not worth spending money on that machine. I bought a functioning Fujitsu laptop with a 6th gen Core i5 Processor and 8 GB RAM for $80 on Ebay. Computers with a 7th gen Intel Core Processor or older won’t officially run Windows 11 so they are selling for cheap these days, if you shop around.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Tiny Core can loadit self into RAM, but it doesn’t have to, you can do a normal install as well. Also even if you want to run it from RAM, it only takes 46MB in RAM not ideal but manageable with 512MB. Also you can even downgrade if you are not UI dependent, you can install the core (non-tiny version) and only needs 26MB RAM.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    RAM will be an issue if they want a Desktop Environment. It would be good to find out max RAM that machine supported and purchase a replacement stick.

    If you can get at least 2gig you might have an OK platform.

    If you can’t increase RAM then there is a cool project called HaikuOS that is super lightweight, they have some popular packages for it, butitd is not a Linux distro with tons of availabe apps. Its got a late 90s feel to it.

  • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wanted to say tiny Core, but someone gave that. So I’ll give another suggestion. Use something XFCE based or LXQt based. Maybe mint in XFCE De is the way to go if you want a feature rich solution that is light on resources.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Maybe mint

      Most ubuntu-based are 1 GiB minimum and dropped support for x86 though.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s going to run like garbage with any desktop environment.

    You need a lightweight window manager.