• betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Someone tried to make a meme out a few random bits of knowledge and I’m not sure what my reaction is supposed to be.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I’m not asking about nuclear physics, I’m asking about where to draw the line between a meme and not a meme. The post is nothing but a few statements with a picture of a cat. I mean, using a cat picture as a bookmark for a science book would be the same thing but I wouldn’t call it a meme. If the cat was famous, maybe we’d have something but I don’t know him.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If the cat was famous, maybe we’d have something but I don’t know him.

          It’s a famous cat insofar as this is a meme template. You just haven’t seen it before.

        • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I’m asking about where to draw the line between a meme and not a meme. The post is nothing but a few statements with a picture of a cat.

          I can draw 7 straight lines in a blank piece of paper, and a lot of people would recognize it as one of the most widespread memes ever on the internet. You should really look up the definition of what a meme is, and it’s biological origin. Hint: memes are not things that make you in particular laugh.

          • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah I haven’t seen all of them. Talk of decay and a cat in the same post leads me straight to Schrodinger’s cat instead.

          • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Ok. So it’s not meant to be Schrodinger’s cat. Yet Schrodinger’s cat and proton decay are so closely related.

          • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Ok I’ll take that. But now I still don’t understand how that particular cat photo meme can relate to proton decay or 10^1500 years. Like, the cat is looking me. So what.

            We could probably make something out of that cat being Schrodinger’s. But I don’t think that’s the point. The cat is outside the box, not inside. I mean, proton decay is quite precisely what Schrodinger’s cat is about, so I’m confused if it’s supposed to be Schrodinger’s cat or not.