Apparently pedestrians should take personal responsibility but not drivers

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Cars are a privilege of rich people.¹ So is personal responsibility rhetoric.

    So, for that matter, is no political violence rhetoric, as well, though the affluent version is we don’t negotiate with terrorists.

    -1.- ( ¹ ) Granted, there are destitute, homeless people with cars, but they’re a higher strata than destitute, homeless people without cars and look down on their sans-car brethren.

    ETA: I’m a home-enabled poor person without a car, trying to get by with an e-bike and thin-spread public transit. And my car-enabled peers look down on me for being transit-restricted. It sucks.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cars a privilege when your city is garbage. When it’s well built they’re more of a pain.

      I own a literal sportscar from when I lived in a car centric place and now I keep it parked behind my mid-density apartment, rarely using it because it’s almost never better than taking public transit. You have to be super rich for it to be actually better because then you can pay for all the parking fees, maintenance, etc. without much thought. I’m not a rich person(BRZs are not expensive sportscars) and all the extra maintenance and tires and whatever else are such a huge pain to deal with and I do most of the work myself!

      What I’m trying to say is that, as someone who can actually claim to “be a car person”, and who has all the skills to back that up, people who think cars are objectively better are dumb as hell and you shouldn’t let their hollow words get to you if you can help it. They’re just losers who repeat shit fed to them by companies like GM so said companies can make more money.