• gianni@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, major OS releases used to cost money for a license. The same way a Windows 11 license costs money. Apple stopped charging for OS releases but Microsoft still does.

      • Mose13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I know this is a joke. Apple is bad for some reasons and good for others. I think there are technologies where the bad clearly outweighs the good (e.g. anything Facebook/Meta). I don’t think Apple is as clear cut. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t put serious pressure (government regulation?) on them for the bad things. IMO Lemmy lacks the nuance for things that aren’t clear cut.

        Here’s an example. Apple laptops are insanely well built +1 points. Apple silicon delivers incredible battery life and performance, and has pushed ARM into the mainstream +1. Apple locks down software and hardware too much -1. Apples labor practices -1. I would love to see better Linux support for Apple silicon (I think it’s exists, but idk how well it works).

    • Twipped@l.twipped.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      MacOS never had licenses, owning a mac was the license because you couldn’t run it on non-apple hardware* until they switched to Intel. I got OS8 from a copy of MacAddict.

      * not counting Gil Amelio’s ill-fated hardware mac clone program