Oh and also thats just the pure energy for acceleration/deceleration, not life support, steering, thrust ineffeciencies, take off, landing etc… 😅

Image the productivity boost!

Although you would probably get where you’re going 12x faster, so maybe about even 😅

Not sure those have a lower risk of accidents 😅

helicopters are 12x more deadly than to cars (per hour)

• https://www.spinningwing.com/helicopter/safety

If only there was some other way for people to get around the city that had much lower risk of accidents that the government could invest in instead of roads…

Sounds like its removed the sort of law that’s just used to target minorities.

Also thier consumer sales is next to nothing compared to what they’re selling to data centers now…

And all the companies they’re selling to are loosing money…

They are completely decoupled from normal economic market motivations…

If they’re not willing to do something as simple as install an app to talk to you, then they were not likely very good friends to begin with (imo).

This argument is very susceptible to Uno reverso 😅

Looking at Google maps, to get to the zoo from a random location in town it’s marginally faster to take the bus than walking, while driving takes a quarter the time, and parking is still about half the price of the bus if you’re there for an hour… Less than half if there’s more than one person in the car… 😅

So based on that I think the parking is way too cheap, and the bus is too expensive and slow…

I find the bigger issue is critical mass: “why would I use an app that nobody else uses?” (when they say “nobody else” in this context they actually mean “not literally everyone else” 😅🙄)

In this case they just mean its not contributing to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

But it is possible to do cooling without heating the earths atmosphere, if you manage to yeet the heat into space somehow, e.g. Paint that reflects the heat as light that passes through the atmosphere into space: https://youtu.be/KDRnEm-B3AI

deleted by creator

You can force a win in a specific 2 player game of non-infinite moves(if it has no draw condition). But yeah , it doesn’t apply generally to any 2 player game of non-infinite moves. And the converse also doesn’t apply generally.

It’s been a while since I’ve done products of sets, but what if one of the sets in the product is a set of empty sets?

You could design a different game that does though. E.g. A Tic-tac-toe variant but the player who starts looses if they don’t get 3 in a row by the end of the game.

Without proper exercise and socialization, they can become quite the trouble makers

that’s pretty much true of any dog… but I guess dalmatians even more so?

That’s the weekend panel.

Oh true 🤦😅

still quite impressive given all the free games they give away and presumably pay the publishers for…

But without wholesale slaughter we’d never have the motivation to build rockets that made space exploration possible! /s