but if there’s less to watch, and more things you don’t want to watch, that time will increase, unless you give up and go read a book or something instead 😅

could have a chip that looks for a certain sequence of bytes then changes some other bytes as a result… it would probably introduce massive latency though…

Will it result in less screen time though, or will it just mean more time spent scrolling past AI slop as well as all the existing garbage movies when looking for something to watch…

I mean sell it with 0 sticks, but I also just realized it uses SODIMM DDR5, and I don’t think many people have that just lying around 😅

They should just replace the ones people hit with metal ones that fit inside the plastic ones, so people never know which bollards they can drive over with impunity, and which ones will fuck up their ride 😂

They should also sell it with empty ram slots…

I’m sure a lot of people have a desktop with more ram than it needs that wouldn’t mind sacrificing a stick or two for a steam machine in thier lounge, especially of they’ve switched over from windows 10 to Linux on their desktop…

Except that it’ll also help ICE abduct and kill them…

Would be a better feature in that situation if it could store the footage on a self hosted server with a dead man switch to publish the footage…

A good example of software failing where traditional systems were more reliable is when Boeing tried to rely on it with MCAS on the 737 max

it will also inform future decisions at companies like rockstar whether union busting is worth the negative publicity…

they should put more cars on the track to simulate gridlock traffic jams, and have a mix of diesel and electric cars in addition to the classic ones, and rename it to autodystopia 😅

oh I see, so it wasn’t a typo: I thought they were trying to say they changed the target from 62 to 70, or from 70 to 62. What a weird way to say they have a target of 62% 😅

Last year Bowen updated its emissions reduction target to 62% to 70% from 2005 levels by 2035.

there’s a typo here but I’m not sure which word…

but I’m a safe driver so that won’t effect me

-average consumer …

this civic ev swap kit looks promising: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VFNb139Nlc

aftermarket ecu should give pretty good control of all the data.

it is a real offence against your children’s future," he said.

not actually as big of a deal when the school has too many children in the class due to education budget cuts, as it’ll help all the other kids in the class have more time with the teacher

that seems to be their priority…

$500 for 100mph is probably cheaper than going to a track day… (after accounting for the probability of enforcement)

that was during the growth phase, we’re in the monopoly phase now…

actually not sure, as they do use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored in a couple of places :

https://github.com/git/git/blob/8d96f09e9245ddf80c1981476fcbac8c4bb4125f/compat/win32/headless.c#L14

https://github.com/git/git/blob/8d96f09e9245ddf80c1981476fcbac8c4bb4125f/compat/regex/regex.c#L20

but apparently that disables it for everything after that line in the file though:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48426484/concise-way-to-disable-specific-warning-instances-in-clang#comment83878587_48426846

I think the second answer on that stackoverflow post might be better than false_but_the_compiler_does_not_know_it_ though…

My guess would be they didn’t like how verbose it was to supress the warning, or maybe they have a coding standard not to suppress warnings, and this was a workaround for that 😅