• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I doubt the defense would go that route but I’m really curious how it would turn out. Like you’re allowed to use deadly force to save a life, and it could be reasonably argued that hundreds, maybe thousands of lives were saved in the aftermath of the shooting.

      Realistically there’s no way that can be allowed to be a legal precident, but it would be funny to try.

      • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Jury nullification doesn’t require a reason and isn’t usually cited as precedent.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I meant specifically a not guilty verdict on the grounds of defense. That would be wild. Obviously nullification or some technicality of law is going to be the best bet.