• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I doubt the defense would go that route but I’m really curious how it would turn out. Like you’re allowed to use deadly force to save a life, and it could be reasonably argued that hundreds, maybe thousands of lives were saved in the aftermath of the shooting.

    Realistically there’s no way that can be allowed to be a legal precident, but it would be funny to try.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Jury nullification doesn’t require a reason and isn’t usually cited as precedent.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I meant specifically a not guilty verdict on the grounds of defense. That would be wild. Obviously nullification or some technicality of law is going to be the best bet.