Pro@programming.dev to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 天前Another Tea memeprogramming.devimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down151cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1338arrow-down1imageAnother Tea memeprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 天前message-square88fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·6 天前Security through obscurity has unfortunately been a successful argument in the past.
minus-squarebrandon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-25 天前https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz for a specific example. While he committed suicide before it was resolved it does show the kind of hammer that can be brought down from accessing public info
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·5 天前This one wasnt about conditions or acys though. Swartz actually had legal ‘legitimate’ access to that publically funded data. He was being attacked for exposing the law to the people, they saw it lije like translating the bible out of latin, but even more devastating to power.
minus-squareSprocketfree@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 天前Yea, that was some copyright bullshit.
Security through obscurity has unfortunately been a successful argument in the past.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz for a specific example. While he committed suicide before it was resolved it does show the kind of hammer that can be brought down from accessing public info
This one wasnt about conditions or acys though.
Swartz actually had legal ‘legitimate’ access to that publically funded data.
He was being attacked for exposing the law to the people, they saw it lije like translating the bible out of latin, but even more devastating to power.
Yea, that was some copyright bullshit.