A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    See the part that I dont like is that this is a learning algorithm trained on videos of surgeries.

    That’s such a fucking stupid idea. Thats literally so much worse than letting surgeons use robot arms to do surgeries as your primary source of data and making fine tuned adjustments based on visual data in addition to other electromagnetic readings

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      Yeah but the training set of videos is probably infinitely larger, and the thing about AI is that if the training set is too small they don’t really work at all. Once you get above a certain data set size they start to become competent.

      After all I assume the people doing this research have already considered that. I doubt they’re reading your comment right now and slapping their foreheads and going damn this random guy on the internet is right, he’s so much more intelligent than us scientists.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        Theres no evidence they will ever reach quality output with infinite data, either. In that case, quality matters.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 天前

          No we don’t know. We are not AI researchers after all. Nonetheless I’m more inclined to defer to experts then you. No offence, (I mean there is some offence, because this is a stupid conversation) but you have no qualifications.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 天前

            It’s less of an unknown and more of a “it has never demonstrated any such capability.”

            Btw both OpenAI and Deepmind wrote papers proving their then models would never approach human error rate with infinite training. It correctly predicted performance of ChatGPT4.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 天前

      They obviously don’t feel comfortable with the robot doing surgery on humans just yet either which is why they’re not actually suggesting doing that yet. It will have to go through years and years of certification before that’s even considered.

      I’m sure most surgeries will still be conducted by humans but there are situations where one of these would be extremely helpful. Any situation where a surgeon isn’t currently accessible and can’t quickly get there. Remote communities, Disaster relief, Arctic research facilities, Starships trapped in the Delta quadrant, War zones, Ships at sea.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      If it were the only option, I’d gladly take it.

      I rely on robots to do a lot of other things in my life, directly and indirectly.

      Well, not many directly. But machines, definitely.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        Yeah it’s not like I refuse to drive my car because it wasn’t handcrafted by a human.

        It is an electrical fault on four wheels, but that’s just because it’s old.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 天前

      know what? let’s just skip the middleman and have the CEO undergo the same operation. you know like the taser company that tasers their employees.

      can’t have trust in a product unless you use the product.

      • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 天前

        I understand what you are saying is intended as „if they trust their product they should use it themselves“ and I agree with that

        I do think that undergoing an operation that a person doesnt need isnt ethical however

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        Hey boss ready for your unnecessary heart transplant just to please some random guy on the internet?

        Yeah so let’s get this done I’ve got a meeting in 2 hours.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        Then it saw Inner Space and invented nanobots. So you win some, you lose some.

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 天前

    So… Judging by recent trends in AI, this will be used to devalue the labor of surgeons and be provided as the only option available to people who are not rich. People will die from what would get a human charged with neglegent homicide but, it will be covered up and, when it comes to light just how dangerous it is, nothing will happen because all of the regulatory agencies have been dismantled.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 天前

      Outside of the US there are pretty stringent rules about what can and cannot be used in the medical profession. Typically it will take at least a decade for a drug to be approved, which is actually a problem in and of itself, but you’re not concerned about that, you’re concerned about technology being used before it’s ready.

      As for “devaluing the work of surgeons”, surgeons are overworked as it is, there is nowhere near enough of them. If they don’t have to do simple procedures then they are available to do the more complex surgeries that actually require skill. They’ll be fine. Wealth isn’t really a factor in countries where healthcare isn’t profit motivated.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      OR maybe everyone — including the poor — will eventually have access to robotic surgeons with the equivalent of like 500 human years of experience, but with the latest surgical best practices that have only existed in recent years. The experience gained by a single surgery could be shared across all of them.

      We’re talking about surgery. If some technology can provide significantly more valuable labor than its human counterpart (which, in this case, could mean more lives saved), then it might actually be worth exploring.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        That would be wonderful. The current way that the world has been “working” for a good while now makes me think it unlikely, unfortunately. The vast majority of technological innovation in the last half-century has been used to extract wealth and replace options available to the non-ultra-wealthy with inferior substitutes that are cheaper to make, often for the same effective cost.

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      I would rather get surgery done by a robot than not get it done at all. I’m not gonna be picky about “devaluing surgeons” if my life is on the line, but if that’s the hill you wanna die on then good on ya, mate.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      You underestimate the demands on a surgeon’s body to perform surgery. This makes it much less prone to tiredness, mistakes, or even if the surgeon is physically incapable in any way of continuing life saving surgery

    • nevetsg@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 天前

      I have seen enough ER to know that operating theatre staff work as a team. So I consider this would be a good thing.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 天前

    Not fair. A robot can watch videos and perform surgery but when I do it I’m called a “monster” and “quack”.

    But seriously, this robot surgeon still needs a surgeon to chaperone so what’s being gained or saved? It’s just surgery with extra steps. This has the same execution as RoboTaxis (which also have a human onboard for emergencies) and those things are rightly being called a nightmare. What separates this from that?

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      AI and robotics are coming for the highest paid jobs first. The attack on education is much more sinister than you think. We are approaching an era where many thinking and high cost labor fields will be eliminated. This attack on education is because the plan is to replace it all with AI.

      It is pretty sickening really to think of a world where your AI teacher supplied by Zombie Twitter will teach history lessons to young pupils about whether or not the Holocaust is real. I am not making this shit up.

      This is no longer about wars against nations. This has become the war for the human mind and billionaires just found the cheat code.

  • xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 天前

    This was a new word for me, so I had to look it up: It’s an… interesting choice of words to describe the success of a robot.
    Of course a robot would perform the job unflappably, it is emotionless by design. I’m pretty sure it would go right ahead and murder the patient unflappably as well. The robot “keeping its cool” is not even a question.

    That said, this does sound very impressive, even if I think there’s some pretty crazy risks involved. Hopefully they have more respect for the problem then self-driving car companies.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 天前

    So are we fully abandoning reason based robots?

    Is the future gonna just be things that guess but just keep getting better at guessing?

    I’m disappointed in the future.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    “OMG it was supposed to take out my LEFT kidney! I’m gonna die!!!”

    “Oops, the surgeon in the training video took out a Right kidney. Uhh… sorry.”

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 天前

    so theoretically they could make sex bots and train them on… so they perform ‘unflappably’!