• reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    what happens if you take it and then stop? Since it adds somekind of antibody, what if it starts replacing/ degenerating your bodys natural system and you get some horrible withdrawal effects if you stop taking it?

    Imagine having to pay subscription to stay healthy / alive

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imagine having to pay subscription to stay healthy / alive

      This is everyone who takes medication to manage a disease/disorder.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure they already have the four colour glossy brochures ready for distribution, as well as financing scenarios for the less cash endowed, so that nobody feels excluded. Who wouldn’t skip a few meals to be healthy after all?

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know that I want the current elderly generation to live longer. Can we hold off on this for… Idk, say, 15 years until they all die off naturally?

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just think of all the additional years of diligent service our Congress members can offer us!

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ah yes, we shouldn’t do research into a condition that harms literally everyone because there are a handful of people we don’t like who suffer from it.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not if you don’t live in the US. Everyone’s going to be immortal except you guys.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s how all medical advances work, they are expensive when they are first developed and then over time they generally become cheaper as patents expire and processes are refined.

          Once upon a time only a handful of people could get insulin to treat their diabetes. When it was first discovered you had to process huge numbers of pancreases to extract enough for one person. Should we have opposed research into treating diabetes because only the rich would be able to afford it?

  • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    They can get more years of service out of us while charging us for this miracle drug. We’ll have to keep working to afford our medical bills

    • IAmLamp@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      Could someone get to work on curing stupid first? Then we can work on the aging part.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Sir/Madame Trebuchet, your cousins of the weighted blade are already a tried & true solution to aristocrat aging.

      Also, I think I just found the name for my new anarcho metal band — if you’re available to fill in on timpani/kettle drum, et al.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plenty of underfunded extremely disabling illnesses to spend money on instead of “curing” aging to fulfill rich able bodied people’s fantasies.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Idk, I’m not rich and id like to stop getting older. Hell, if I could just stay my current age and then die of cancer in 30 years, that’d be great.

  • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sounds good but likely nothing will come of it!

    The only thing holding biology and its thousand medical fields is its self imposed ethical restrictions! We can genetically modify rats to have or not to have genetical diseases; we can make them bigger, stronger, live longer… We can make them fucking glow in the dark! But by being in the same class, we are very very very different animals! The large majority if invented medicines will go nowhere as they are almost exclusively tested on rats until the finished product is tried to be licensed…

    Not to be misunderstood, I don’t want thousands of baby girls to die in testicular cancer! Nor do I know of a better way, I am just mildly annoyed at the holdback in holding up our duty to humanity

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe funding illegal human experiments for longevity on a container ship in international waters is Elon Musk‘s next project.

      • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What I find disturbing about his brain chips is the lack of news… I would think the guy that bought a social media site, then virtually forced all its users to follow him would brag that he found his cock on the research site… But nothing? I reckon something went awry!

        If some collossal fuckup were to happen/ happened that would bankrupt the whole field for decades!

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The rumours suggest China is harvesting organs from uighar prisoners. What’s to stop them from using them to test various chemicals?

      • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        International backlash if they wanna use the data as the entirety of its research must be made available to the peers, you can’t forge 1000-s of case studies! Could be done retroactively, but that would add 5-10y down the line

        Also do you know how insanely expensive organs are? I really don’t think those are used for research

  • halferect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think people should age, I think max 80 years is good and after that you are just being a dick

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would rather live healthily for a longer part of my life, than have it extended while sickly and suffering.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Supercentenarians show us up to 120 years at a high quality of life (everything else is being a dick) is feasible in theory.

      • halferect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure we can go for longer but we shouldn’t, people need to die, and those 120 year Olds ain’t working so they ain’t worth shit, 80 gives you enough time to work a give back and than enjoy and than fucking die.

    • catty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      and after that you are just being a dick

      Not me. I’ve started much earlier!