• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s crazy about this whole thing, is how many people I see insenting this can’t be WW3, solely because there have been multiple events happening that people said could lead to WW3…

    Like, think of it as placing straw on the back of a camel.

    Eventually you’re going to get to the point where lots of people say another straw will break it. That’s just reality, it can’t hold an infinite amount of straw.

    Now imagine how ridiculous you’d be for walking up when the camel can barely stand, and loudly and proudly telling everyone the camel’s back will never break, because people have been saying it would happen for the past hour.

    Rather than realizing that some people would guess early to be safe, because guessing late means your break the camels back and are shit out of luck.

    trumps going to keep throwing straw till the camels a bloody heap, the man has never shown restraint in his life. It’s a matter of when, not if.

    So if it doesn’t happen after this, it doesn’t mean it’ll never happen, just that were even closer than before.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Except it’s not like either of the other two wars.

      I’d agree with the comparison if, for example, the US attack on Iran immediately brought Russia to war with the US, which triggered Article 5, which got China involved. That sort of domino effect happened the last two times but doesn’t appear to be happening now.

      Could it become WWIII? Maybe. But right now it still looks like a regional conflict, and a rather small one at that compared to the first two Iraq wars.

      But I’m only 1/3 of the way through the latest Perun video so I reserve the right to change my mind.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What’s crazy about this whole thing, is how many people I see insenting this can’t be WW3, solely because there have been multiple events happening that people said could lead to WW3…

      This. It starts with a cascading series of small, often unrelated events that coalesce over time. They may not seem connected until viewed in retrospect. There might only be just a couple of belligerent nations pushing the boundary to see how much they can get away with at first, until eventually other nations decide to stop being bystanders and intercede in a now global conflict.

      I’m not inclined to doomsay and predict that World War 3 is imminent, but I’m not going to rule out the possibility that people in the future might be talking about the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine or Israel/the US and Iran like they do about Germany annexing the Sudetenland and Japan invading China.

      And with the threat of nuclear armageddon feeling closer than ever since the Cold War, I’m worried the takeaway from these events is just going to be that not having nuclear weapons is a mistake (Ukraine voluntarily surrendering theirs, Iran supposedly trying to develop some). The best way to not get invaded is to have nukes.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Barring the participation of larger military countries such as China and Russia, Iran (and the Middle East in general) does not have the capability to retaliate against the US in any militarily significant way outside of symbolic attacks on US bases in the area. Troops are never going to set foot on US soil. Planes are never going to reach US airspace. Missiles will be shot down over the water long before they get close to US territory. The US is in a unique position on the globe that makes any kind of military attack or invasion borderline impossible. I do not fear “WW3” or anything because Iran has no capability of taking action that could spark WW3 independently, or even in a coalition with regional allies.

    What I do believe will happen will be terror attacks on the US mainland by suicide bombers and Iran sympathizers. It’s the only possible way that Iran can directly attack the US in any meaningful way, as it would be again borderline impossible to stop a lone wolf attacker from landing on US soil, heading to Home Depot to buy some supplies, and pulling a Timothy McVeigh. And Iran isn’t on a time schedule here. They can wait a month, 3 months, a year or more if they want, wait for our guard to be down, and launch a retaliatory terror attack in the middle of East Bumfuck, Idaho. Or smack dab in the middle of Chicago. Or at a baseball game. I am infinitely more afraid of them pulling something like that than I am of this turning into WW3.

    And if Iran’s top advisors have half a brain, they’ll allow the US to continue thinking that today’s attack on the base in Qatar is the end of it. The “symbolic gesture” of retaliation meant to save face. Let the US think that this is all they’re going to do and then spend the next 6 months planning for the real attacks. Heck, play into Trump’s ego and let him believe that Iran is too afraid of Trump to do anything else. He’d be dumb enough to fall for it.