Act’s bill was pretending to be racial equality, which it isn’t
I quoted the bill above and I’ll do it again here because you seem to have an issue with reading comprehension:
Principle 3
Everyone is equal before the law.
Everyone is entitled, without discrimination, to—
a) the equal protection and equal benefit of the law; and
b) the equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights
The Bill literally, explicitly, an unequivocally calls for racial equality. There is no amount of Orwellian doublespeak you could possibly utter which could twist opposition to this as anything other than ugly racism.
equality, it declared there is already full and complete racial equality
No it doesn’t. Read it. It requires legal racial equality. If the only way for you to argue this is by pretending the bill says something it doesn’t, reconsider your premise.
No one claimed acknowledging past racism is racism. It’s the racism I’m claiming is racist. If you don’t support racial equality, you are racist.
deleted by creator
I quoted the bill above and I’ll do it again here because you seem to have an issue with reading comprehension:
The Bill literally, explicitly, an unequivocally calls for racial equality. There is no amount of Orwellian doublespeak you could possibly utter which could twist opposition to this as anything other than ugly racism.
deleted by creator
The bill calls for racial equality. You oppose that. You are racist.
deleted by creator
No it doesn’t. Read it. It requires legal racial equality. If the only way for you to argue this is by pretending the bill says something it doesn’t, reconsider your premise.