Cool. I stopped paying for it back when it was still called “YouTube Red”, during one of their many crackdowns on creators’ freedom in the name of benefitting advertisers. I dumped it and installed an adblocker, and eventually YouTube Vanced and its successor Revanced.

The “critique” is a non-issue pushed mainly by uppity Europeans

fwiw I’ve seen it most often from Latin Americans.

The first woman (Christina Koch), non-white person (Victor Glover), and non-American (Jeremy Hansen) in deep space. And Reid Wiseman.

I worry about this sometimes. I don’t ever want to be seen as speaking “for” minorities I’m not a member of, but I do want to be seen speaking “up for” them. And I worry about finding the right balance. I don’t want to speak over them, but do want to help make it clear that I support them and I am opposed to those who are opposed to them. I don’t want to be MLK’s “white moderate”.

We’re on Lemmy. A not insignificant percentage of the crowd are tankies.

Thanks!

What’s the reference here?

Insomnia > Postman.

I switched to Insomnia around 2021 when Postman started enshittifying and found I liked it a lot more. Insomnia has also been relatively enshittified unfortunately, but it feels like it’s to a lesser extent.

it has been a rethorical one trying do point out the case of US-defaultism

No, I understood that. My reply was meant to be read as a rebuke to that idea. Because it isn’t an American day. It’s less observed in America than it is in many other countries. Claiming it to be US-defaultism relied on a mistaken assumption that because some Americans are talking about it, it must be a uniquely American thing.

Ironically, your complaint about “US-defaultism” was itself the US-defaultism.

And what does this strange word “international” mean???

It means international. As in it’s an official holiday in a bunch of countries, and unofficially observed to one degree or another in a whole heap more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Women’s_Day

(Note: disregard the map shown on this page. It’s unsourced and does not match the article’s text.)

Worth noting that Lemmy receives at least some institutional funding for its development. And I believe some of that funding is contingent on hitting active user goals or similar metrics.

What’s xz?

I’ll admit I don’t know all the differences between locally run, open source models that are used for accessibility and the horrible plagiarism machines we all despise the most

Fwiw 99.9% of the time someone talks about ak “open source” generative AI model, what they really mean is “open weight”.

An open-source model has public training code and training dataset, allowing full reproduction

— a random Reddit post I found when looking for a good definition to share

Some people (including the author of that definition) don’t like the need for open source models to have an open source dataset. It’s also not clear to me whether that definition is even supposed to mean the dataset is actually public domain, or just clearly defined (e.g. “we trained on all top 100 best-selling books from the period 2000–2020”). The former would obviously be very meaningfully different from closed models in terms of accusations of ethical problems in the training process.

Open-weight models basically just mean you can download it and make some slight tweaks and run it at home. It means the big AI companies aren’t benefiting financially from your use and can’t train on what you feed them for their next model, and because these are typically designed to be run locally rather than in a data centre the environmental impacts are lessened. But in terms of the training process it’s no better than closed models.

Often, but not always, yes. If the misunderstanding is reasonable and they had ample opportunity for an explanation but didn’t, then yes, it’s an idiot plot.

If they legitimately didn’t have an opportunity to explain, or the explanation, while true, was completely unbelievable, that’s not an idiot plot IMO.

It’s gotten to the point where a lot of people very clearly think even the word conspiracy means “a crazy nonsense theory”. They’ll say “it’s not a conspiracy…” and then proceed to describe a textbook conspiracy.

Yes, they have two options. Either honour the sticker price, or stop selling it at all until the price is fixed.

In Australia if the price at the checkout is higher than the price tag you are entitled to the first item free

Got a source on that? That’s not what the ACCC says.

They would have to refuse to sell to anyone. It would likely not be lawful to leave it on the shelf and sell it at the higher price to someone else who might not have noticed the discrepancy, until they fix up the shelf pricing.

Australia, the country the article is talking about. That was a quote from the ACCC website.

Reminder that by law, if the price is listed wrong:

Sometimes the price of an item in store or online at the checkout may not match the displayed or advertised price in store or online. If this happens, even by mistake, the business must either:

• sell the product for the lowest price - either the checkout price, or displayed or advertised price, or
• stop selling the item until the incorrect price is corrected.