cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoU.S. attorney for D.C. accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda,’ threatens nonprofit statuswww.washingtonpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1314arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1313arrow-down1external-linkU.S. attorney for D.C. accuses Wikipedia of ‘propaganda,’ threatens nonprofit statuswww.washingtonpost.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-text
https://archive.is/2025.04.26-183918/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/04/25/wikipedia-nonprofit-ed-martin-letter/
minus-squarechronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoI grew up being indoctrinated with this shit. They truly believe it and a man named Ken Ham, the fucktard that he is, is largely responsible for this bullshit.
minus-squaretaladar@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoWell, to be fair Ken Ham has a sort of super-power, listening to him for any amount of time makes your brain leak out of your ears.
minus-squarechronicledmonocle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoPretty much. No idea how Bill Nye debated him and came out without brain damage.
I grew up being indoctrinated with this shit. They truly believe it and a man named Ken Ham, the fucktard that he is, is largely responsible for this bullshit.
Well, to be fair Ken Ham has a sort of super-power, listening to him for any amount of time makes your brain leak out of your ears.
Pretty much. No idea how Bill Nye debated him and came out without brain damage.