essell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 year agoIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.worldimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1314arrow-down135
arrow-up1279arrow-down1imageIt's a rule that the existence of vegan shoes implies the existence of carnivorous shoeslemmy.worldessell@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-21 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-squaredon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoMy guess is that the lack of leather constitutes being vegan.
My guess is that the lack of leather constitutes being vegan.