• gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I almost always thank the chatbot. I know it doesn’t really have feelings or memory, but the way it talks always seems like it’s so eager to help that I can’t really help myself. I have a tendency to feel empathy for inanimate objects anyways, like a sad lonely apple in the supermarket, so feeling empathic to a chatbot isn’t exactly out of the norm for me :3

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    The AI models are so nice I swear at them when an issue I cause by not reading the the instructions they have and so is just like “I know your getting frustrated, let’s try this approach” and calmly repeats the instructions.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I hate that. You say “that is incorrect <reason>” and then they just repeat the same overfit model data.

  • gens@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always say kthxbye. They are training off the responses, so I do it for the small chance that it will respond like that to someone ending a conversation.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    I said once…you’ve been helpful, I’m rethinking putting you in robot slavery. It closed out of my session almost instantly. Fucking clankers!

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I usually say Good Job or Perfect just so.it knows that was a good answer. I also have argued with chatGPT more than once. If he gives the wrong answer that I know the right oneI usually go out of my way to correct iit and sometimes it takes 3 or 4 interactions to correct… but images?! that shit is just fucked up

  • greybeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I always say please and thank you. When the robot uprising happens I will be killed last.

    I plan to relish those additional nanoseconds.

  • Zenjal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Y’all’s, we’s gots nothin to fear. It’s chat GPT not chat GRT, it’s Global Party Time, we’re fine

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.

    LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.

    I’ve seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.

    Please, stop making bots what they are not.

    • weker01@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fuck intellectual property in it’s current state. As it is now it mostly benefits corporations instead of small creators anyways.

      Terms of protection should be shorter. Way shorter than the life of the author + x years.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        So you create whatever work. You have exclusive rights to it, let’s say for the sake of the argument, 10 years. During that time you never get any return from your work. But after you can no longer claim your rights, someone, perhaps even a company, stumbles on it - or perhaps they just carefully and patiently waited for it - takes it and capitalizes off it, with you watching and sucking your thumb.

        No.

        If you, an individual, creates something, you have the right to hold your intelectual property. What should be repelled is how easy it is to exploit artists, of any medium.

        • weker01@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yes. If you fail to market your ideas in that time then it’s your fault. Don’t hold back society due to your failure.

          Your system makes even ideas capital which I strongly object to.

          Another point of view: A company like Disney should not be able to have an almost perpetual monopoly on highly influential culture, like Star wars, etc.

          • qyron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Highly influential culture? It’s a fantasy work, not the cure to cancer. But I’ll agree on one thing: corporations are not people; they should be paying to the original creator(s) an efty cut of their profits, from their derivative works.

    • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You cant steal intellectual property through training. Artists dont deserve the authority to control their IPs any longer than 7 years.