Only four months after winning re-election as a longtime Democrat, Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson announced that he was defecting to the Republican party. Before assuming office, Johnson served nearly a decade in the Texas Legislature as a Democrat — making his decision to switch parties all the more shocking.

On Friday, Johnson announced his decision in an 0p-ed in the Wall Street Journal. “Today I am changing my party affiliation,” wrote Johnson. “Next spring, I will be voting in the Republican primary. When my career in elected office ends in 2027 on the inauguration of my successor as mayor, I will leave office as a Republican.”

In his op-ed, Johnson says that he won 98.7% of the vote in his re-election. Although it’s worth noting that was when he was running as a registered Democrat in a county that President Joe Biden overwhelmingly carried. The mayoral position is technically non-partisan, but it’s hard to argue that running as a registered Democrat in a deep-blue county didn’t have some impact on the vote.

Johnson criticized Democratic leadership, arguing that Democratic mayors (of which he was one until a few hours ago) have allowed cities to crumble into “disarray” and lawlessness. Johnson also pats himself on the back for standing up against the defund the police movement.

Johnson paints a picture of Democratic Mayors that is wholly incongruent with the state of play in blue cities. New York City’s Democratic Mayor, Eric Adams, is literally a former cop. And D.C.’s Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser has fought tooth and nail to prevent criminal justice reforms from going into effect.

He isn’t the only southern Democrat to defect to the Republican party in a dramatic fashion. In July, Georgia State Representative Mesha Mainor announced that she was switching to the Republican. Mainor, who served in a deep-blue Atlanta district, defended her decision by arguing that she was pushed out of the Democratic party. Mainor was criticized by Georgia Democrats but welcomed with open arms by folks like Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Greene, who applauded her decision to move parties.

As for Johnson, there will surely be a ton of backlash, but maybe, like Mainor, he’ll make some friends in his new party.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly it should be illegal to change parties AFTER being elected as the another.

      You know what two can play at this. See what happens if I run as a Republican for office get elected and then switch to a Democrat afterwards.

      How long before Republicans outest me?

      Fucking the Democratic party who back him and probably finance him should make part of the party creed that can’t just change parties like that after you won.

      • Serinus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t have to officially change parties to change votes.

        • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? Parties are just a way for people to try to guess how and if their elected officials are going to lead.

          • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not true in many branches of government. In many situations the party that has the majority of seats gets a big amount of additional powers.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s all contingent on the speaker or equivalent getting the necessary votes. You could get into the house as a Republican and vote for Hakeem Jeffreys to be speaker.

  • morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I’m sorry, fairly-right-of-center Southern Democrats. You’re not quite evil enough for me anymore, I need to spread my wings.”

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you switch parties, it should be an automatic special election to be reelected.

    • Case@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I came to, apparently, agree with you. My exact thought.

      This is clearly a trick to get into power, and we all know Republicans love power before anything else. Morals, the children, the budget, actual constitutionally protected rights, etc.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see why, people vote for the candidate not the party

      And it’s fairly evident that parties aren’t a single voting block

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that people should be voting for person not color and doing so is quite the failing at most Americans consideration towards politics…

        But unfortunately party lines does still in fact matter a lot. Nominations can still only be done by them and certain blanket funds go towards party specific nominees no matter what so he has essentially stolen money from people who donated to a party not person.

        I’d say it should trigger a vote of confidence for the general populace but not necessarily immediately new elections and he may still be open to lawsuits if there was intent he knew what he was doing running in a party he didn’t agree with.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you campaign as X for X.

        Then as soon as you win, you change to Y.

        Thats a fundamental fraud against the voters, and 100% deserves a special election… Especially since he could have easily changed his party BEFORE the election, or after his term was up.

        Theres nothing tribal about it.

          • WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t necessarily have to, but then you have someone like Trisha Cotham in NC who switched parties to give the GOP a veto-proof majority and has been voting with them in lockstep ever since.

            If they weren’t planning on acting as Republicans they could just as easily become independents.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you feel as though him staying a D would have meant he would continue to vote D instead of just voting R?

              • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Huh? He’s a mayor, not a senator. The only voting R/D he does is as a private citizen, just like us.

                Mayors vote on city policies, which are unlabelled, but you can still categorise laws based on what they do.

                • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ll rephrase for you

                  As mayor, do you think the way he votes will change based on the party he’s apart of

  • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    These people are so fucking selfish. You were hired as a public servant, you should serve the people who elected you

    • Secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe we shoukd vote for people’s platforms and not a political party. Rank choice perhaps…

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I keep seeing this said on these sort of posts, like the average voter has anything to do with the voting system being used or has the power to change it. Those with the power to change would never change the voting method. They would almost assuredly gain nothing and lose almost everything.

        This isn’t a direct rag in you, personally. I just don’t know how to expect the wolves to accept the addition of other predators in the hen house. Obviously, it takes a unified electorate to get change like this via elected officials with simple goals and they’ve spent the last several decades hyping up wedge issues for people to fight each other over that no one could ignore those things to vote and push for a change to the national voting method.

        Just like the president not having the power that the electorate believes them to have, I’m just too cynical, now, to expect anything positive to change before I die of cancer from some shitty corporation that wants to cut corners to add some zeros to their bank accounts.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think we will be remembered poorly in history as yet another civilization that did nothing while terrible things happened.

            “First the came for the weak and I did not care cause I had a smartphone”

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously. I have no idea how you could be non-white and vote for these people.

      I know the white working class has been fed a steady diet of fox propaganda for 30 years, but bipoc and lgptq? You’re not the target audience for the propaganda, and it should be pretty obvious how much they hate you.

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wealth, probably. I would guess someone like that lives and works in a well-insulated bubble of whiteness that now feels like home to him. He now basically identifies as white, unless it’s convenient not to. The guy probably believes that racism is not a modern problem, bootstraps, etc.

  • fodderoh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    My bet is he wants to run for governor after he is done being mayor and knows he needs to be a Republican to have any chance at winning.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are we taking bets on whether or not there’s some sexual assault or corruption allegations surfacing soon and he knew only the Republican Party would protect him from that?

    • ikapoz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily. He might just be greedy for a bigger job in Texas policy. If he can throw the brown shirts a little victory without it costing him reelection that could get him enough currency for them to want to support him for higher office.

      Cynical exercise of power for personal gain is not illegal so far as I know.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Johnson criticized Democratic leadership, arguing that Democratic mayors (of which he was one until a few hours ago) have allowed cities to crumble into “disarray” and lawlessness.

    Dallas has a terrible violent crime rate. Looks like fighting against defunding police did jack shit for them.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was elected to represent the people that voted for him based on the beliefs he carried. If those beliefs significantly change to the point that he no longer represents the people that elected him, he should resign.

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Serious question, what if he didnt change his opinions but only party affiliation. He still acted as he would have as a mayor and he still gave the people what they wanted… just change of title. Like what if he thought his style of politics belongs on the other eisle and people are so partisan that they think he switched everything.

          • klemptor@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            In that case I’d wonder why he ever was a Democrat in the first place. I’m not sure how realistic a scenario that is, especially given the public announcement he felt the need to make.

      • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        The job of an elected representative isn’t to do what they want, it’s to represent the people who elected them. The people elected a Democrat as a mayor, and no they have a republican one.

        The two parties operate on fundamentally different platforms, so I don’t see how he can both switch parties and stay true to what he promised voters when he was elected

      • Rootiest@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Politicians are supposed to follow the will of their constituents.

        His responsibility is to the people. Of course he can change his mine, but he should still do his job for the people who elected him and if that is contrary to his own beliefs to the point where he is unable to do so then he should resign.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a dumbass. However I wish the Republican defectors like Cheney, Kinzinger, Romney, or pash ones like Flake or McCain etc… Had the spine to flip to Democrat…

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      All of those people are/were super conservative. Being anti-Trump doesn’t make you a dem

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Democrats are the big tent party. The more the republicans shift to the far right, the more the tent expands to pick up the ones that stayed behind.

        The far right movement will only shift the Democratic Party to the right to pick up the stragglers, not make it any more left.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          And in other countries, random coalitions combine to form a coalition govt. in the USA, random coalitions combine to form a party. It doesn’t mean progressives won’t continue to gain ground as they have been.

          But let’s be clear, Cheney, Flake, and most of the others mentioned are on the right flank of the GOP. Their only redeeming quality is being anti-Trump because they don’t want their party to be unpopular.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Democrats are only interested in picking up Republicans, while they punch left. It’s like they are fighting to become the dominant conservative party

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not anymore they’re not. Times change, people change, parties change.

        What a real Republican is, today, is a traitor. Nothing more than a casualty to the cold war.

        It’s why these so-called (former) real Republicans are leaving.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, thats what conservatives have always been.

          They just stopped being subtle about it after Obama’s win.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a glib interpretation of history at best.

            Perhaps since Reagan would be somewhat accurate.