• ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unless someone is literally about to start a new job in two weeks anyway, why the hell would they take such a pitiful buyout? $25k is jack shit these days especially when the cost is your entire livelyhood.

        • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is when your replacement is someone with undying loyalty to a fascist dictator. It’s not about efficiency, it’s about loyalty and ideology. The more people leave, the more powerful Trump Musk Trusk becomes.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also it prevents them from joining another government position for 5 years or they have to repay it before they start the job

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      and the funds probably have to be allocated by congress… as it is they and NOT a diaper-wearing buffoon in lifted shoes, that controls the ‘purse’.

      even the maga nuts in congress should be pissed as hell at lord diaper’s unconstitutional power and money grab.

      • dnick@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Might have to look at that though, it’s possible once the funds have been allocated to a department Congress extra less control over how there are used. As long as there’s some loophole where the money can be spent on severance, and it doesn’t cost more money than was allocated for the year(how can it? It’s just paying people for not working)