• 9 Posts
  • 4.77K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • Every attempt to make something idiot creates a bigger idiot

    While I totally see the point this is already “solved” in that they shouldn’t have high beams on in the first place.

    Pedestrians and cyclists are tough because drivers don’t think to toggle their high beams, even If they see pedestrians and auto-high beams aren’t any better. We’re out of luck

    In my neighborhood we have very narrow streets and where there are sidewalks not pavement right next to the street. I never thought I’d appreciate the small amount of separation a standard sidewalk give but it actually does make a difference in how blinded your u are by traffic. But the bottom Line is similar to yours: this is a high density neighborhood with streetlights where no one should use high beams to begin with. Realistically there are several Poorly placed houses whose owners are probably even more frustrated



  • At least in Manhattan, traffic is usually slow enough that pedestrians are at least as fast. Also they tend to go as a crowd. I’ll usually wait for the light but when hundreds of other pedestrians swarm into the street I figure we’re fairly visible and safe.

    I would never drive in Manhattan simply because it’s the slowest and most frustrating way to get around. I used to drive around queens when I had a girlfriend there but we’d always take a train around the city, and I’m sure traffic has only gotten worse. It’s just not worth it


  • This may be another case of needing technology to rescue people who are just that dumb.

    • Auto-high beams have been getting better over the years to the point that humans can no longer claim to be more responsive. They just work. Every time. And never forget
    • my car has active matrix headlights and it’s freaky to drive at night with the high beams on and watch a dark spot follow surrounding cars

    In ten years we’ll all forget how to toggle off high beams, as it will just work most of the time. But at the same time we’ll be blinded less as the machine never forgets


  • My similar anecdote is people taking a right on red without stopping (or apparently looking), and would probably be included in those statistics. Since there may be a pedestrian or cyclist just around the corner you can’t see until you’re at the intersection, stopping and looking is critical for safety

    I used to be a proponent of right on red, because who wants to be stuck at a dead intersection? If you only consider cars, it’s a nice efficiency gain. But now non-car users like pedestrians and cyclists don’t have a safe time to cross the intersection. And it’s so much worse now that people turning right on red seem to have forgotten the parts about “after coming to a complete stop” and “yielding to other traffic”













  • Oh I’ve posted repeatedly about an underrated danger of pulling back from EVs, for example, is not only are we not establishing a commercial base for future manufacturing, but after a few quarters of profit, American manufacturers will find themselves unable to compete globally. We are doomed for a long slow death of protectionism.

    What even are the options at this point? Car manufacturing is millions of jobs and a huge part of the economy so we can’t afford to let it die. But they’re already focussed on vehicles that can’t be sold anywhere else, and now they’re ceding the entire global market while no longer even developing their own technology.

    But politicians can’t afford to let them fail. So I’m calling it now: the next president will have to continue the protectionism while investing billions of dollars in incentives to try to help them recover. But they’ll still drag their feet, still focus on the largest models and highest trims that none of us can afford. The EV market will be ascendant, with established leading manufacturers, while legacy car companies will still be trying the squeeze pennies out of a dying market rather than compete